
Originally Posted by
Wrish
But the fact is from this case as described here, we don't know whether SE did an investigation, and we don't know whether the stay-at-home mom broke the ToS.
It could be, as some are saying, that an innocent homebound gamer-mom was in the wrong place at the wrong time, got auto-banned, and this "Bisby" character lazily sent out a canned response without investigating.
Or it could be, this mom had too much time, got mired in activities breaking the ToS, got banned, got unbanned tentatively along with a group of others (or alone, as a result of that insider connection), and finally upon investigation got banned for good.
SE claims to ban for ToS violations, not because you have slanted eyes and can't type English. There may be a correlation between the two, but surely there are exceptions. That someone can write a letter of appeal doesn't make them innocent... That someone is disabled and caring for kids and evokes all the pity in the world doesn't make them virtuous and incapable of rule-breaking.
Nitsuj's friend knows exactly what happened, but the only way for the rest of us to know for sure is openness with the details of each banning, something SE may be reluctant to grant lest ToS violators hone their way around the detection mechanisms.