Got bored, made this. Doesn't count stuff in people's sig. Just FYI.
http://img163.imageshack.us/img163/5792/asdfasdfs.png
I can't really ridicule you for thinking this way, as I think that most people make the same mistake until they are taught otherwise. It's so common, in fact, that is has it's own name: Gambler's FallacyOriginally Posted by Gtype954
Kaeko just fucking won the thread....
Someone lock this and let's start over, and possibly include a rule, that you get a 24hr ban, if you post a theroy without testing it yourself, and providing screenshots.
Well, I tried.
I do love the drop rate thought retardation posts whenever they get made![]()
I sure hope that SE hired a more competent programmer than this. Hopefully one that understands probability theory and games of chance.
http://i344.photobucket.com/albums/p...ling-gtype.jpg
Well more on pic than rants about random number generators...
I agree that most LS cannot bring AV down to the point where Bracelets Meteor is an issue. I would go so far as to say that most LS cannot bring AV to 79%, where meteor is added back into AV's spell list. AV is not an easy fight, and even for the best of LS's people die all the time during the course of the fight. Most LS cannot survive long enough to lock AV's regeneration... let alone its two hours.
When you combine how difficult AV is with the fact that just about any LS can take down JoL... and you can see where all the interest about AV comes from. Its only natural to think that you can do well against AV when JoL is so easy. So you have many people here who have done a few JoL's come in and see if they can contribute to this puzzle. But, these same people do not stand a chance of bringing AV down to 79% or Bracelets.
Most LS do not have enough members for AV. Most LS dont have the skill involved in bringing AV down. And those who try find how dificult AV actualy is. After that it becomes more difficult to motivate its members to try this again.
Then you have the older LS's. These often have the members for this endevor, but they lack the motivation to go out and test, yet another, AV. Thats where i am at this moment. I can count how many people in the ls who wouldnt mind doing another AV on my fingers. I can count how many are excited to try another AV on one hand. People who have tested this stuff, and are capable of bringing AV down in HP% are finding it difficult to test this stuff.
So saying that people should be 24 hour banned, or what ever, for posting in an AV thread without testing a theory themselves AND including pictures is dumb. Not only does a policy like that prevent discuission but it also prevents brainstorming of ideas. Calling people retarded also injures the process of brainstorming ideas. And thats what AV threads are, people brainstorm ideas until one pops up that seems viable enough that people are willing to attempt it. If anything, people should get 24 hr bans for thrashing other peoples ideas instead of offering instructive criticism. hehe or offering suggestions that have already been tried before.
Its been long understood that when you join an AV thread you are here to read speculation, brainstorming, and theory's. Some ideas are going to be good. Most ideas are not going to be good. This is the way things go in AV threads.
Alright, now I've never "bashed" anyone for even the most outlandish ideas.
Also wall of text, CONTRIBUTING NOTHING TO KILLING AV. 80% of this thread is arguing about the thread itself. 10% is theories, and 9% is facts. I just wanted a thread with facts.
Also, you started a sentance with "hehe", which for some reason made me want to strike you in the nostrils with a baseball bat. :-/
Nothing personal mind you.
something did seem wrong there..
unless he has just been trolling us and they are about to get a kill
I'm thinking scholars. Lots of them. Fuck with the weather! /slap
ya I wanna see this pic
don't be bullshittin