Still, curious what you think, I'll get ya tomorrow.
We need to see if we can work it into a politics thread.
Science actually can explain that. It's called sleep paralysis and will generally affect the uneducated more then it would the educated; the uneducated have a harder time rationalizing what they've seen. Combine that with alcohol and you have some of the best abduction/ghost/god stories you could ever dream up.
I'm sorry if you're too fucking dense to see why it's far less likely we meet non carbon lifeform, particularly intelligent one who required and even higher degree of complexity. It has nothing to do with bias, it's the most stable complex molecular structures in our universe, and by far. I never said other structure were impossible, but implying we are biased for believing carbon life form are the most common (or nearly as common) is retarded.
And don't worry about me, I'm not overestimating the capabilities of the human race...far from it. In fact, I believe that most people are fucking idiots, it has nothing to do with religion. I've seen a bunch of intelligent people with spiritual beliefs in physics and maths...religion doesn't make you dumb, it's the lack of education.
Never said the bias was about the probability of the existence and regularity of a certain type of conglomeration, now did I? Reading comprehension, feel free to get with it. Go back over what I quoted until you understand the part of your statement that was biased, then feel free to return and continue discussion. Or just continue making bland insults proving how socially inept and debased you are. Either is fine with me.
However, the latter combined with the second part of the above quoted post amuses me greatly. If you decide to simply continue with the latter, please don't fail to continue providing the entertainment.
I am using big words and proper grammar, therefore your argument is invalid. I not need explainith myself, you can discover what I was talking about on your own.
Good day.
LOL at some news source knowing about something like this before the general public did. This would be nice if it were real, but it's not.
It was already explained why there was no dust plume on impact. Artificial ruins? LOL come on now. They would have been spotted by now.
Sure, will do.
You started with
The sarcastic tone of your post undoubtedly imply that you believe "non traditional" life form might be very common, since you're attacking people who believes outside life will be somewhat similar to Earth.Originally Posted by Kryssan
My reply was
Originally Posted by Kaylia
The probability was implied in my statement, and it's by no mean a "biased" value. I simply pointed out where the first "most stable" structure that can lead to complex molecule. There is none before it, and the one after are fucking rare in comparaison.Originally Posted by Kryssan
Sure. I will make it short and simple. People like you who waste their time bashing religion are not only fucking stupid, but generally hypocrite as well.However, the latter combined with the second part of the above quoted post amuses me greatly. If you decide to simply continue with the latter, please don't fail to continue providing the entertainment
Secondly, if you take christianity for exemple, Vatican already stated many years ago that discovery from sciences were always right. Many can accept stuff without trying to find a special meaning.
And fyi, I don't believe in God or anything, I just fucking hate hypocrisy
Aren't there silicon based micro-organisms that live inside volcanos and magma vents already?
Or was that an episode of the x-files.
I can't keep shit straight anymore.
You're thinking of lifeform that use sulfur instead of oxygen maybe?
http://www.corrosionsource.com/handb...odic_table.gif
Sulfur is right under oxygen, and because of this, it behaves similarly. They are still carbon based life form, and generally feed on corpse from above, even if they "breath" sulfur.
Gonna check on the net to make sure I'm not bullshitting, but I think thats what it was.
[edit]
Sound about right, here is the wiki link for these lifeform if you're interested.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Archaea
[edit2]
Also, many lifeform use silicate I believe to make their shell, but it doesnt really matteré
Probably. I just remember something somewhere about people being really shocked about shit living inside volcanos and around deep undersea magma vents.
This was viral marketing for the new movie The Fourth Kind; not sure if someone else posted but yeah.
That makes sense, Uni has been very naughty about advertising the movie
Originally Posted by Wikipedia
I still want to see life arise from non-living matter (which I consider to be the true god-killer - moreso than aliens) in my lifetime.
Just creating some amino acids with basic elements + heat and electricity doesn't impress me, a 6th grader can do that.
Also...just so we're clear - there was no RNA or DNA in the meteors, right?
GDI
Was actually excited about this. Was skeptic until I found more official sources...but yeah...
Thanks for the info though!
Edit: Although it sparked interesting conversation between my fiance and I about the sudden leap in technology after the Roswell incident.
I was pretty sure it was BS right from the start and all but this line pretty much iced it for me. Coast 2 Coast is hilariously silly stuff. I used to listen once in a while back in the Art Bell days and always got a chuckle out of how he accepted without challenge anyone who had some kind of crazy story.He furthermore claimed in a Coast to Coast AM radio interview that
Regarding life on other planets: The odds that there is life out there somewhere in some form are fairly good. The odds that there is life out there that has developed light speed travel, is O2 breathing carbon based life form with head, 2 arms, 2 legs, 2 eyes, etc is pretty much fucking NIL. I'll pretty much guarantee you that any abduction theory out there is a hoax or a hallucination of some kind. My guess is that were we to discover life of some kind elsewhere in our or other galaxy that we would at first not recognize it as life- it would be that different.
So like, even if another planet had evolved life, what are the chances that it didn't happen a billion years ago and they already died out from, idk whatever? I don't think it's just about what planets CAN evolve life, it's about what planets have the capability and did it recently enough that if we were to go there, look about, and actually find some or some evidence of it.
Fuck man, I read that entire thing trying to find out where they found the bacteria or w/e and just got more and more confusedDeception.