LOL! omg.
I gotta' appologize to Moo. He's nothing compared to this idiot.
So Miami's not below average because they lost close games to good teams.. but the Jets aren't mediocre(worse?) because they lost close games to Miami? I don't even know whats being argued anymore.
They made Indi sweat too, but that's neither here nor there. All I'm saying is Miami has played tougher teams through the first 8 games, have the same amount of losses as the Jets, and has beat the Jets twice. I just don't see how you can rationally say with conviction that the Jets are better. Look, Miami isn't in the upper echelon of the NFL, but they play damn good football, especially for losing their team leader. To say that they're a terrible team is showing complete football ignorance.
D.Will down, we're more fucked then we currently were.
q.q cachoo
ANYWAY!
V.Young 10/12 80yrds 1 TD 24yrds rushing WUT!
GB looks horrible
Fair enough. I just don't see why it's such a stretch to say I think the Jets are marginally better, even though they lost two games head-to-head, because both of these losses combined were by less than a touchdown combined and were statistically dominated. An objective person could see the argument either way.
I don't know. On offense no doubt, even though Jones is having a hell of a year for his old ass. But you could make an argument for at least 3+ jets on the defensive side for the pro-bowl (Revis Harris Scott), and Jenkins for sure if he didn't go down.
Rodgers looks good on his back
I think Peterson just matched his effort from Packs/Vikes game1.
Panthers defensive doing good as usual hopefully JD will keep up the decent game he's playing