RNG updates

[Amastacia]

So here are my results:

Machine Crossbow:
hits squarely- 5.4-6.5
strikes true- 6.6-9.7
hits squarely- 9.8-13.1

Culverin:
hits squarely- 3.9-4.6
strikes true- 4.7-5.8
hits squarely- 5.9-8.2

Coffinmaker:
hits squarely- 3.9-4.7
strikes true- 4.8-5.9
hits squarely- 6.0-8.3

Loxley Bow:
hits squarely- 4.6-5.5
strikes true- 5.6-7.7
hits squarely- 7.8-11.0

Selene's Bow:
hits squarely- 6.4-7.5
strikes true- 7.6-10.8
hits squarely- 10.9-15.9

Hexagun:
hits squarely- 3.9-4.5
strikes true- 4.6-5.8
hits squarely- 5.9-8.2

Outside of Loxley, I'd chalk all the other variances (which are only 0.1-0.2 off of previous results) up to elevation differences. Loxley is the only real outlier (for the record, Loxley is a longbow; same model as Sarnga).

I did some short testing on Peacemaker as well and it was matching up to every other gun, but I was interrupted before I could fully finish and I didn't really care enough to start over.

Loxley behaves like Lamia Kaman, which is also a longbow model.

That's kinda funky.

[Masamune]

Very nice testing guys, /cheer.

I'm wondering how those different "spots" translates in terms of dmg penalties/bonus multipliers, anyone could enlighten me please (i dont have any ranged job) ?

[Amastacia]

A penalty is applied to RAtt when standing outside the "sweet spot" (when you get the strikes true message), and that penalty gets worse the farther from optimal you are.

The only "bonus" for being in the right spot is the lack of penalty.

It's generally assumed that RAcc is also dependent on distance, with the highest RAcc in the sweet spot, but that's nightmarishly hard to test, so no one's bothered.

[Masamune]

A penalty is applied to RAtt when standing outside the "sweet spot" (when you get the strikes true message), and that penalty gets worse the farther from optimal you are.

The only "bonus" for being in the right spot is the lack of penalty.

It's generally assumed that RAcc is also dependent on distance, with the highest RAcc in the sweet spot, but that's nightmarishly hard to test, so no one's bothered.

That i guessed of course, i meant more something like continuing this distance test further into quantifying those penalties if outside sweetspot. Numbers {Can i have it?} ^^