
Originally Posted by
Vuitton
My parents were married up until this past year. I am 26, so I don't consider it a "broken family". I actually consider the term a bit accusatory and unnecessarily negative. Some families are more broken when they're together and end up better off after they split up.
It is unfair to portray families as some how "broken" because the father and mother are not living under the same room and are not married.
Is it broken if they're divorced and living together peacefully?
Is it broken if they're married and living apart?
Is it broken if they're unmarried and living together?
Is it broken if one parent dies while they're still married, and then the other parent raises the child(ren) on their own?
Is it broken if the same widowed parent remarries?
Is it broken if a parent is sent overseas because of the military and the other parent is left to raise the child(ren) on their own?
Is it broken if a parent is raising their child(ren) alone because the other parent was abusive? The family is better off without the abusive parent, how is it broken?
I can continue to create questions similar to these for different situations. The flaw of believing a family can be "broken" is that there is a perfect, ideal, natural form of a family, and anything else is considered "broken". The world is too diverse to consider one form of a family as healthy or "whole", and all others as "broken".
A relationship can be dysfunctional, and usually that involves abuse.