Yeah I agree. I really love Eric Bana in everything I've seen him in. Ang Lee just tried to make the shit way too "artsy" for what it was.
Yeah I agree. I really love Eric Bana in everything I've seen him in. Ang Lee just tried to make the shit way too "artsy" for what it was.
For anyone here, I'd suggest avoiding /g/, /v/, /b/, and especially /co/ for awhile. Unless you want spoiler-rama, its all over the fucking place.
edit: And youtube >.>
Spoiler: show
oh shit I was just reading up about that last week. I hope it will be good too.
I thought both Daredevil and Ghost Rider were equally terrible, Ben Affleck should die in a cardboard box fire already
All the complaints about Ghost Rider and no one mentioned that Blackheart was just some guy when he could have been http://wpcontent.answers.com/wikiped...lackheart4.jpg
back on topic
just saw this movie, it's pretty decent but some stuff just don't make sense
I liked the first Hulk movie a LOT more than Ed Norton's... The first Hulk movie made the character feel a lot more powerful, they went into great effort to show how he got stronger and more invincible as he got angrier/grew.. They took there time, but I came out feeling like Hulk was really.. Hulk. Ed Norton's hulk was just... ya. He would turn into Hulk, pretty strong, but not "earth shattering power" that I think of when I picture the hulk. The story was also pretty lame in Ed Norton's as well.. and I love Ed.
I LOVE the Iron man saga, and hope the 2nd movie delivers as much as the first. Im actually pretty sad they want to incorporate the avengers, as it takes away the "realness" of IronMan for me..
But we will see, maybe they can pull it off...
Please don't say its not comic-centric.
http://i43.tinypic.com/i1w7qd.jpg
http://movies.yahoo.com/movie/1810026429/video/18505104
there's a few new clips.
Meh, had me teased for a moment. Last one is from April 28th.
Out on the net in russian dub heh
Pretty decent movie. Will see when it comes out in theaters for sure. Good spin on Crimson Dynamo/Whiplash combination. Scarlett was really a bad choice for Black Widow imo or the part was poorly written for her. I think Don Cheadles talent was wasted on Rhoddey.
Spoiler: show
Fuck. I just checked prices for IMAX around here. The real IMAX theater, not those knock off ones trying to be one. 18 bucks + 2 dollar "service charge" to buy it online. From what I read, it's only going to be a 2 week engagement, so I really want to see it in an IMAX. For me and 3 friends it'd be 80 bucks. I'm sure it's worth it, every other movie I've seen in this theater has been worth it. It's just really fucking expensive, and I know it's gonna get sold out.
It's only 12.50 for the IMAX here, sounds like you're getting hosed >.> Already bought my tickets for Saturday up at Indy
http://www.wisevid.com/play?v=9A_gb8cwuqtb
Not bad for a cam version.
Someone brought up a very good point; they focused more on the characters in order to delve deeper into the deteriorating psyche of Tony Stark, but it seemed more like a cop-out not to include more Iron Man scenes in the movie to keep the cost of production down.
So to answer your question, Titanss, I think you won't get your fill of special effects from this one.
I doubt theyre using cost as an excuse. 2hr movie with $200m invested (60m more compared to IM1) is pretty liberal, Avatar cost less to make. Theyre going to get atleast $500m in revenue, and theyve already gotten $100m in rev with the movie still unreleased.
Still, Iron Man itself has very little screentime![]()