When I blather on about morals, do you think I am referring to (a) the letter of the law, or (b) the spirit of the law? Are morals now somehow associated with drones? Do some video game developers aspire to be drone coders? XD
You have me scratching my head.
So my anti-Windower stance contradicts self-discipline, predicated on my not wanting to be a dipshit. And the logic would be obvious were I to use Windower, which incidentally would make me a hypocrite. Pray tell, are you simply trying to say that no one can be genuinely opposed to Windower?
Or rather are you admitting that Windower tempts you into bannable actions and that the self-discipline comes from evading bans in the face of temptation? In that case I have news for you. SE does the bannings, not some high moral authority. You're seeking to slip past its Swiss-cheese detection system. Better to use street smarts, not some purported discipline.
Wow, all that to cover up your trivializing someone's work as a mere "text file," as if that has any bearing on the effort to write it. Where does that leave us? You wrote, "editing text macros and XML files for Spellcast is easy as pie." What am I supposed to do, take your word because you are a videogame developer? You gave no argument; you only contradicted me and employed smoke and mirrors. Until you really argue it, I'll just continue saying that there is a learning curve to get much utility out of Windower. Don't make me start with the 5-page crib sheet on Spellcast variables...
Heck yeah, spirit of the law is a practical and often necessary compromise to all-out enforcement. On this we agree. Where we apparently disagree is what kind of spirit we're extracting and from where.
You took my Distance comments out of context. Nowhere do I say that SE presently enforces a ban on Distance usage. All I specified was how it's detectable, should SE ever choose to ban those using it. And thus I never took your offer to GM someone on a hack not deemed serious enough for current enforcement policy.
You know, I thought this forum more so than others was frequented by an older population that typically places more emphasis on morals and policy effects than individual social reputation, personal attacks, and arbitrary, unbacked interpretations of the ToS or employee behavior.Us adults who aren't bound by excessive and unnecessary interpretation of society's restrictions
SE could easily encourage interface enhancements with a short clause exempting some types of third-party programs from their categorical disablement. Their ToS is devoid of such terms; thus, it is certainly NOT in the spirit of the current ToS to allow any version of Windower. You are instead proposing an entirely new amendment based on their presumed inaction toward some violations, an inaction we've too many times learned is mutable.
XI Wiki



