9/11 Did Not Happen During The Bush!

[Dimmauk]

LOL



The daily show had a great take on this subject. So this is what the GOP has come too?

[Ghost_Wheel22]

Clearly they were referring to George Bush, Sr.

Get your facts straight next time, my good sir.

[antihero]

http://www.bluegartr.com/forum/showthread.php?t=39376

[Dimmauk]

http://www.bluegartr.com/forum/showthread.php?t=39376

Wrong!

[Souj]

http://www.bluegartr.com/forum/showthread.php?t=39376

youtube thread doesnt count in this case. that's like posting a picture of an article in the random image thread.
bitches be crazy.

[Leif]

This thread is a complete hoax.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E6tR-XOL43M

She says that we "inherited the most tragic attack on our own soil". Understandably, this verifiably true statement got you really angry.

9/11 was a serious attack that was inherited based on the foreign policy weaknesses of the Clinton administration. Unlike his two predecessors who routinely responded to Muslims blowing up Americans, usually with some sort of big explosives, Clinton refused to do anything about it. Bush inherited Clinton's foreign policy, which traditionally sticks around for about a year after a change of policy.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4kpfhGxJbLc

This verifiable false statement is, most likely a slip up. No, that isn't a pathetic excuse, but it wasn't a main talking point of hers. I find it entirely plausible that she intended to say something else. I personally do not believe that her statement accurately affects her belief. Considering she also looks stable compared to the MSNBC crowd, I also find it difficult to believe that she is delusional or something.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=If0PVzsZMqg

LOL

I don't agree with Giuliani, but liberals should. They have been howling for the past 8 years about how there is no terrorist threat. Now you guys are willing to stop lying?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2w6PDIm-fPc

Nothing better to top off a weak argument with the dramatic tones of Keith!

The daily show had a great take on this subject. So this is what the GOP has come too?

First: These people do not speak for the Republican party.
Second: These people do not speak for conservatives.
Third: The first lady was 100% true. The next lady was not advocating a conspiracy theory. And Rudy wants the liberals to love him; why wouldn't he adopt their version of the events.
Fourth: This is a pretty weak argument for saying that the "GOP" (only one of them was ever elected to office as a Republican) is full of a bunch of crazy people.
Fifth: These videos are not recent.
Sixth: Stop trying to sensationalize random commentators. Are we supposed to believe that Barack Obama thinks there are 57 states?


This is completely pathetic. I feel like I've wasted time making a long, boring argument about how you have no argument.

[Kirin]

Were any of these statements made in a negro dialect?

[Leif]

Were any of these statements made in a negro dialect?

On a side note, can we stop harping about the Republicans using "code words" for racism and just admit that the Democrats are always the ones that say racist things and actually run on a platform of racial discrimination?

[Cyn]

On a side note, can we stop harping about the Republicans using "code words" for racism and just admit that the Democrats are always the ones that say racist things and actually run on a platform of racial discrimination?

What? This is a bit out there even for you Leif.

[Guyverarmor]

What? This is a bit out there even for you Leif.

you expected any less from him?

[Leif]

What? This is a bit out there even for you Leif.

It is not. I've complained about this many times before. The actual racists (Democrats) call the guys that actually want equality (Republicans) racists.

[Demosthenes11]

On a side note, can we stop harping about the Republicans using "code words" for racism and just admit that the Democrats are always the ones that say racist things and actually run on a platform of racial discrimination?

thats a weird looking D next to trent lott's name

[Leif]

thats a weird looking D next to trent lott's name

Trent Lott's statement was questionable. He did resign. Many conservatives called on him to resign. The Republicans do not want racists in the party.

Complaints about Trent Lott always fail to realize that the guys who historically opposed racial equality were the Democrats!

[Demosthenes11]

Trent Lott's statement was questionable. He did resign. Many conservatives called on him to resign. The Republicans do not want racists in the party.

questionable? lol. I thought you said that all racists are democrats. Also, do you not remember every republican radio talk show host play apologetic over lott? Saying it wasn't a big deal, taken out of context, not what he meant, etc. Fuck I honestly feel like republicans have amnesia over what went on after that lol.
But I digress, because comparing lott's and reid's comments is absolutely irresponsible and juts shows republicans really don't understand why lott's comment was unacceptable and racist.

PS stop equating conservatives with republicans

[MF Perm tha Fineass]

What? This is a bit out there even for you Leif.

Oh Leif's just ice fishin' for the winter, don't mind him.

[Xno Kappa]

Catching a few like he always does while he's at it. Why people still respond to him at this point is beyond me.

[Celeras]

How much donation money was required to ban somebody again? Lets start a pool, I'm in for 10.

[Correction]

I'd pay 250 dollars for a lifetime on bg without Leif.

[Olo401]

Catching a few like he always does while he's at it. Why people still don't have him on ignore at this point is beyond me.

ftfy

[Ziero]

She says that we "inherited the most tragic attack on our own soil". Understandably, this verifiably true statement got you really angry.

9/11 was a serious attack that was inherited based on the foreign policy weaknesses of the Clinton administration. Unlike his two predecessors who routinely responded to Muslims blowing up Americans, usually with some sort of big explosives, Clinton refused to do anything about it. Bush inherited Clinton's foreign policy, which traditionally sticks around for about a year after a change of policy.

So if it takes a year for foreign policy to change, and means that 9/11 was actually Clinton's fault, wouldn't it also mean that any "attacks" that happened so far under Obama would still be Bush's fault? I mean, Obama hasn't been president for a year yet so it's still all Bush's fault.