9/11 Did Not Happen During The Bush!

[Leif]

Yeah and we're one of them. Good job at not knowing your own country lol

LIBERALS PLEASE EXPLAIN YOURSELVES. When you state something like "You're wrong, you don't know your own country" and then top it off with a "lol", you don't seem credible.

EXPLAIN YOUR POSITIONS. This is not difficult.

I thought I proved already that arguing tax code with faux libertarian tea bagger would get people nowhere. Because no matter how many quotes or how many constitional articles you present they will always come back with "well, thats not what he meant! what he meant to say was..."

What? Who is "they" or "he"?

[MF Perm tha Fineass]

LIBERALS PLEASE EXPLAIN YOURSELVES. When you state something like "You're wrong, you don't know your own country" and then top it off with a "lol", you don't seem credible.

EXPLAIN YOUR POSITIONS. This is not difficult.





What? Who is "they" or "he"?

[Leif]

Great argument, liberals!

[Day]

Holy shit I want to know the context so bad

[Olo401]

Olo... What I said is you scare me for thinking that all of one's wealth should be taken by the state upon death, which is what you said is "logical". Please go reread, I'll wait.

And that's something that I never said.

When a person dies with a middle class net worth (these days we'll say that's under a million dollars) you're correct and I will agree with you all the way. But a person dies with many multiples of millions of dollars in net worth, even when it is taxed at a high rate (30-50%) their child's life WILL be MUCH BETTER than their own because they will have started off with a HUGE advantage already. The ONLY reason to do so is consolidation of wealth, and by extension consolidation of power.

You have to understand this - at a certain point of accumulated wealth a estate tax is necessary. Without it, kings and serfs are created.

By all means, please keep making yourself look like a fool. As far as big bold type goes, I had a reason - if you had said that to me in person I would've decked you.

[Olo401]

Olo... What I said is you scare me for thinking that all of one's wealth should be taken by the state upon death, which is what you said is "logical". Please go reread, I'll wait.

And that's something that I never said.

When a person dies with a middle class net worth (these days we'll say that's under a million dollars) you're correct and I will agree with you all the way. But a person dies with many multiples of millions of dollars in net worth, even when it is taxed at a high rate (30-50%) their child's life WILL be MUCH BETTER than their own because they will have started off with a HUGE advantage already. The ONLY reason to do so is consolidation of wealth, and by extension consolidation of power.

You have to understand this - at a certain point of accumulated wealth a estate tax is necessary. Without it, kings and serfs are created.

By all means, please keep making yourself look like a fool. BTW if you think I'm a tough guy you're wrong I'm seriously a nice quiet guy.. but if you had said that shit to me in person I would've laid you out.