Senate Special Election in MA

[willriker]

Leif is here!

Did you even read the republican proposals? If you did, even if you only read 1/20th of the bill the proposed, you would see that they only serve exemplify everything i have been writing about.

[Leif]

Leif is here!

Did you even read the republican proposals? If you did, even if you only read 1/20th of the bill the proposed, you would see that they only serve exemplify everything i have been writing about.

I have no idea who you are and I spend more time on these forums that I should. So, no, I don't know what you've been writing about.




Also,

http://homepage.mac.com/mkoldys/blog...s/speeches.jpg

Everyone sure has a lot of interest in what the loser has to say!

[Ragnus]

There is just more interest in seeing what the twit who somehow screwed up winning in MA as a Democrat had to blame her loss on.

[MF Perm tha Fineass]

I have no idea who you are and I spend more time on these forums that I should. So, no, I don't know what you've been writing about.




Also,

http://homepage.mac.com/mkoldys/blog...s/speeches.jpg

Everyone sure has a lot of interest in what the loser has to say!

How did Fox News cover 200% of information while the other stations covered 100%?

Fox is pretty fucking amazing, or did they play both speeches simultaneously?

edit: Oh MSNBC covered 130% of information.

[MF Perm tha Fineass]

HAHAHAHAHHA

johnnydollar.us is http://homepage.mac.com/mkoldys/blog/jdp.html

Some dipshits free Mac blog site.
Great source dude!

[Cratylus]

If your house catches on fire, it's free for firefighters to save it. If someone breaks into your house, the police will try to catch the suspect - for free.

It is not free in either case. Its absurd to insinuate that one's taxes are not paying for those services.

[MF Perm tha Fineass]

It is not free in either case. Its absurd to insinuate that one's taxes are not paying for those services.

Oh we caught a dense one!

So you're insinuating firefighters and police should be free market? Just like healthcare is now, this would be really effective.

Please lay out your case why taxation is bad, this should be good.

[Leif]

HAHAHAHAHHA

johnnydollar.us is http://homepage.mac.com/mkoldys/blog/jdp.html

Some dipshits free Mac blog site.
Great source dude!

I'm sure anyone who can measure (when they started airing the speech, stopped airing the speech) and can place some bars on a graph is qualified.

But, in the event that you actually read the website, you'd see that he spells out exactly what information he graphed in addition to its source.

In this case: http://newsbusters.org/blogs/brad-wi...brown-cuts-his

How did Fox News cover 200% of information while the other stations covered 100%?

Fox is pretty fucking amazing, or did they play both speeches simultaneously?

edit: Oh MSNBC covered 130% of information.

Did anyone else lose any IQ points after reading this?

Why was I cursed with all of the stupid liberals responding?

[Takedown3]

agreeing with finesse on using that great source for that obviously correct graph

way to go!

[Leif]

agreeing with finesse on using that great source for that obviously correct graph

way to go!

More stupid people!

If nobody gets it in a few more posts, I'll have to give away the secret!

[MF Perm tha Fineass]

I'm sure anyone who can measure (when they started airing the speech, stopped airing the speech) and can place some bars on a graph is qualified.

But, in the event that you actually read the website, you'd see that he spells out exactly what information he graphed in addition to its source.

In this case: http://newsbusters.org/blogs/brad-wi...brown-cuts-his




Did anyone else lose any IQ points after reading this?

Why was I cursed with all of the stupid liberals responding?

OH THANKS FOR THE UNBIASED SOURCED MATERIAL, BUD!

About NewsBusters.org

Welcome to NewsBusters, a project of the Media Research Center (MRC), the leader in documenting, exposing and neutralizing liberal media bias.

[Leif]

OH THANKS FOR THE UNBIASED SOURCED MATERIAL, BUD!

I am becoming stupider by the minute.

You can't read something that says "MSNBC started airing the speech at X time and stopped airing the speech at Y time, so they aired Y-X of the speech!" and then scream bias.

Are conservatives really the only guys who can subtract?




There are actual points you guys could make to try and give a reason why the two other networks cut short Brown's speech more than Coakley's, but you guys are just screaming provably false accusations.

[ZarakiKujata]

Why was I cursed with all of the stupid liberals responding?

http://i209.photobucket.com/albums/b...l-castro-2.jpg

[zoobernut]

More stupid people!

If nobody gets it in a few more posts, I'll have to give away the secret!

It was graphing the percentage of each speech covered. Not the amount of time spent on each one. So each speech could go up to 100% denoting they covered the entire speech. The two bars are not connected therefore do not need to add up to 100%. Each individual one can go up to 100%.


Is that explanation enough?

Also Leif why have you been responding with "I don't know who you are." lately? You said it to me in the other thread as though you knowing who someone is makes any difference in a debate on an internet forum.

[Leif]

Also Leif why have you been responding with "I don't know who you are." lately? You said it to me in the other thread as though you knowing who someone is makes any difference in a debate on an internet forum.

Because his point was "if you have been listening to me lately you'd know ------".

My response is "No, I haven't been listening to you lately, so you'll have to give it away."

It was graphing the percentage of each speech covered. Not the amount of time spent on each one. So each speech could go up to 100% denoting they covered the entire speech. The two bars are not connected therefore do not need to add up to 100%. Each individual one can go up to 100%.


Is that explanation enough?

Yes!

[MF Perm tha Fineass]

I am becoming stupider by the minute.

You can't read something that says "MSNBC started airing the speech at X time and stopped airing the speech at Y time, so they aired Y-X of the speech!" and then scream bias.

Are conservatives really the only guys who can subtract?




There are actual points you guys could make to try and give a reason why the two other networks cut short Brown's speech more than Coakley's, but you guys are just screaming provably false accusations.

I'm not sure why I'm not trusting numbers coming from a website that gives voice to birthers and death panel heralds, among other things. Not to mention it's incessant promotion of the racist tea party.

It's weird I know, I don't believe in Santa Claus either.

[zoobernut]

Because his point was "if you have been listening to me lately you'd know ------".

My response is "No, I haven't been listening to you lately, so you'll have to give it away."

Ah I guess my confusion comes from the fact that neither me nor the other poster said anything about "listening to me lately". Not dredging up the other thread but in this one the post you responded to simply asked if you read the bill which has nothing to do with the person who made the post.

[MF Perm tha Fineass]

It was graphing the percentage of each speech covered. Not the amount of time spent on each one. So each speech could go up to 100% denoting they covered the entire speech. The two bars are not connected therefore do not need to add up to 100%. Each individual one can go up to 100%.


Is that explanation enough?

Also Leif why have you been responding with "I don't know who you are." lately? You said it to me in the other thread as though you knowing who someone is makes any difference in a debate on an internet forum.

Wrong, all the networks gave the same amount of coverage time to the election and speeches. So in that time frame you cannot exceed 100%. MATH YOU.

[Leif]

I'm not sure why I'm not trusting numbers coming from a website that gives voice to birthers and death panel heralds, among other things. Not to mention it's incessant promotion of the racist tea party.

It's weird I know, I don't believe in Santa Claus either.

What? Again, stupid.

Birthers believe in something fictional.
What "death panels" are is ambiguous. When Sarah Palin said it, she was right. When Keith Olbermann said it, he was wrong.

How are the tea partiers racist?

[Demosthenes11]

Wrong, all the networks gave the same amount of coverage time to the election and speeches. So in that time frame you cannot exceed 100%. MATH YOU.

wut lol
it means it fox news carried all of the speeches of both candidates, while the other networks did not cover much of the republican candidate.
whats hard to understand here >.>

100% = all of that person's speeches