did you just link me to a page listing what they are currently talking about in congress and try and pass it off as accomplishment?
it boggles my mind that people like you finally have all the pieces needed to get what you want in washington yet only make excuses when nothing is done. the 2 party system is so fucking broken.
also, stop this civil bullshit about not wanting to start things. what conversation is there to have other than a political argument? "Well steve, there is an election going on didn't you hear?" "oh thanks for the heads up karl, ill go look"
honestly you can't be like "so this election will change everything and has huge implcations of bad shit happening, dont say anything bad." civil = agreeing with you.
No I linked you to a page that had the legislative accomplishments of the current Congress along with everything else that was currently in debate or committee, and you decided not to look at the part of the page that says "Public Laws, 111th Congress (selected)". My fault here was not pointing out that this list isn't complete (i.e. fair pay & mental health parity Act aren't listed) and that it's a Senate page not a overall Congress page.
Oh I don't know.. how about just straight information reporting without having to deal with partisan bickering for once? Maybe instead of injecting partisanship into it look at it for once with an objective eye, as if you were watching a sports event as a neutral party? There's quite a few of us here who have so far managed to do it - why can't you?what conversation is there to have other than a political argument?
i honestly can't think of anything else to say other than "lol ok bro"
u win dog
edit: omg look at all the bills passed in 2006 they did such good work! http://www.lbo.state.oh.us/fiscal/pu...ssedin2006.pdf
Either way the outcome, it will be EPIC.
I think you're all wrong the voters are going to do, symbolically, what that some Dem big whig said. Something along the lines of, "Why vote for the people that crashed and walked away from the scene of the accident?"
That irony of that line tops anything Obama or Biden have goofed so far.
1% Reporting (7 precints) - Brown 54, Coakley 45, Kennedy 1
There's a fantastic town-by-town flash tally on Boston.com btw, check it out.
7% reporting (143 of 2168 precincts) - Brown 51.1, Coakley 48.1, Kennedy 2.8
17% reporting (363 of 2148 ) - Brown 52, Coakley 47, Kennedy 1
25% reporting Brown 57%, Coakley 47%
36% Reporting [783 of 2168] - Brown 52.6, Coakley 46.4, Kennedy 1
Still lots of blank spots in Bristol/Plymouth/Worcester counties, but Brown is winning the towns along the 495 loop.
52% Reporting [1119 of 2168] Brown 52.7, Coakley 46.3, Kennedy 1
Just heard one of the robocalls put out by Joe Kennedy's campaign and JEEEZ nothing like dancing on a dead man's grave huh?!
THIS JUST IN - PROVINCETOWN FOR COAKLEY (it's the faaaabulous pantsuits!)
Coakley's getting slaughtered. Bye-bye democrat supermajority, hello complete legislative gridlock (as opposed to the near compete gridlock from before).
OLO! Hi ya sleepy bastard!
Just in conversation the past few days it's very surprising how many staunch democrats are thoroughly disgusted with Coakley and planning on voting for Brown. Coakley assumed she could win with no effort and is facing the consequences. Almost all of the ads I've seen on tv for her have been trying too hard to make Brown sound like he eats babies, while his have actually tried to show why he wants you to vote for him instead of not voting for a baby-eater.
Polls were pretty busy I guess, should be interesting to see how it all turns out. And yes, I voted for Brown, gogo baby-eater!
71% Reporting [1543 of 2168] - Brown 53, Coakley 46, Kennedy 1
AP just called the race for Brown, MSNBC reporting that Coakley has called Brown to concede.