
Originally Posted by
SathFenrir
It was my understanding, and feel free to correct me if I'm wrong, but the majority of people working for NASA and the whole space exploration industry already didn't see a point in sending people into space and that it was all started as a pissing contest during the cold war to show how l33t america is.
Unmanned spacecraft and telescopes, both terrestrial and ones in orbit, have contributed 99.99999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999 99999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999 99999999999999999999999999999999999999999999% more to our understanding of the universe and the discovery of other possible earth-like planets.
Perfecting terraforming, suspended animation for travel, and etc. are all currently being heavily researched here on earth without any need to send people to the moon. In fact, it will eventually BE perfected long before we have any need to actually physically test it.
Sending people into space is outrageously more expensive than sending unmanned probes or developing new, stronger telescopes, and etc. for far less information gained.
tl;dr? We shouldn't be sending people into space. It's an astronomical waste of NASA's already exceptionally tight budget that could be used to break more advancements in space exploration than we could ever get by sending some douche named buzz to the moon.