Gimp/Confused/WTF Player Thread XVII: Keep it Fresh

[Narol]

Lolhaidate, we all know warrior is supposed to fulltime barone legs.

ftfy

[Drex]

armadillo cuisses

[noodles355]

I don't check his gear, he does his job lol. All that matters to me.

Gimp/Confused/WTF Player Thread XVIII: He does his job, that's all that matters!

[Thorny]

Gimp/Confused/WTF Player Thread XVIII: He does his job, that's all that matters!

seconded

[WANG]

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v1...awke/Pmig3.png

The Karizo pic is probably about 5-6 months old. Just for clarification purposes, I lent him my Avalon Breastplate, and he is not a noob. Just didn't have any gear at the time, but I will post his gear for redemption. (this is bad PR for us QQ)

http://www.ffxiah.com/item_sets.php?id=130977

[Raen Ryong]

That's still a nasty mix of everything without any kind of focus <_<

[WANG]

Yeah, I agree...dunno what was up with that lol

[Ezhno]

The Karizo pic is probably about 5-6 months old. Just for clarification purposes, I lent him my Avalon Breastplate, and he is not a noob. Just didn't have any gear at the time, but I will post his gear for redemption. (this is bad PR for us QQ)

http://www.ffxiah.com/item_sets.php?id=130977

Set is named "PLD_idle -"

Enmity rings

I thought you were trying to convince us he wasn't a noob?

Constructive Edit: Have him build an idle for Atonement with Acc ring, Rajas, Haubergeon, Brutal/Hollow/Suppa combination (depending on what he's got), and then Shield/PDT Idle for non-Atonement, because it looks a lot like he's mixing the two and adding enmity rings for some crazy reason.

[DAKPluto]

Yeah, I agree...dunno what was up with that lol

/sigh...Taru

[Beave]

I thought you were trying to convince us he wasn't a noob?

Constructive Edit: Have him build an idle for Atonement with Acc ring, Rajas, Haubergeon, Brutal/Hollow/Suppa combination (depending on what he's got), and then Shield/PDT Idle for non-Atonement, because it looks a lot like he's mixing the two and adding enmity rings for some crazy reason.

He'd be better off using 2x acc rings than using acc/rajas, haub+1 obviously, my set just kept suppa/ethereal for earrings since brutal would only proc with joytoy if said attack round wouldn't be an occasionally attacks twice.

[PEIPld]

He'd be better off using 2x acc rings than using acc/rajas

store tp, lowering x-hit build etc

[noodles355]

I thought Rajas/Acc ring > 2 Acc rings or Lava/Kusha

[Raen Ryong]

Correct. Rajas is almost always the answer, 1hander, 2hander, PLD, whatever.

[Beave]

store tp, lowering x-hit build etc

This is generally true, however, I was only talking about a pld atonement idle set, not any other job. At most, you might require one less hit for 100% tp, but for most pld that don't have the greatest gear (i.e. the pld in question) his acc isn't going to be all that great, and many hits will be for 0. That being said, I'll stand by my statement that he would be better off using 2x acc rings, and save the rajas for a real melee job.

[noodles355]

In other words 2x Acc ring or Lav/Kush are for people who chose the wrong CoP ring

[Raen Ryong]

You would need stupidly low accuracy for 4.5 acc to be > Rajas for Atonement PLD

[PEIPld]

many hits will be for 0

Which makes the 5str on Rajas an additional factor.
5 str AND One less attack round vs (at best) 4.5 acc?

[Beave]

I can assure you with 100% certainty that 5 str alone will no absolutely nothing to help you not hit for 0.

[Raen Ryong]

If you don't count the minor Attack gains you can, but:

Assuming you have no other Store TP, Rajas Ring is approximately +5% WS frequency according to the formula pchan posted yesterday. At what point does 2.25% accuracy give you 5% WS frequency?

2.25/x = 0.05

Therefore x = 2.25/0.05 = 45

Therefore, if accuracy > 45% without either ring equipped, Rajas gives more WS frequency than Toreador's in the second slot.

[Nightfyre]

So, that full JSE DRG I posted a while back? Ran into him again.



Sapphire Earring w/ no augments, everything else should be obvious. Can't say I'm surprised given what he was wearing before, but... ew.