Sarah Palin's TelePALMter Handjob at Teabagger Convention 2010

[ZarakiKujata]

The financial/insurance companies are all worried about their capital funds and look at what they're spending their money on.

ftfy

[SwampdonkeyPLD]

Insurance companies want the government to take over their industry?

[Khamsin]

Insurance companies want the government to take over their industry?

I think the only ones (in the business) that would really care are CEOs and the most senior levels of management. For everyone else in the company, a job's a job.

[ZarakiKujata]

Insurance companies want the government to take over their industry?

No I was reversing it for you, the boards of these companies don't want government regulation, so since he was elected these corporations have also been coincidentally using their money to sow discontent amongst the tea party crowd?

[Chun Liroy]

And Leif makes this thread complete....

[ravbane]

Just in time to label Palin naysayers as women haters.

[Leif]

Fucking this!

Everyone should take the time to see Stephen Colbert explain Palin's reasoning on the difference between Rahm Emmanuel and Rush Limbaugh saying retard.

White House Chief of Staff? Radio talk show host? Boy, same thing!

Insurance companies want the government to take over their industry?

No, but they sure like their current monopolies. Some government in their favor is in their best interest.

Just in time to label Palin naysayers as women haters.

What? Although, whenever a conservative woman/black/hispanic/etc, liberals are always the first to jump up and start screaming the most flamboyant hate speech.

Liberals say conservatives are the sexist/racist/whatever party, accusing them of "hidden prejudices" and "code words", yet when liberals encounter someone they oppose that they see as a member of one of the left's victim classes, they lose it.

No I was reversing it for you, the boards of these companies don't want government regulation, so since he was elected these corporations have also been coincidentally using their money to sow discontent amongst the tea party crowd?

Oh yes they do.

Shockingly, when insurance companies take a look over at the owners of the Democratic party over on Wall Street, they want the kind of security those companies have. Whenever they go bad, the Democrats continue to bail them out. They have done this for decades.

The first rule of the free market is that everyone acts in his or her best interest. The opportunity to take risky deals with a security blanket of the government is priceless. Who would turn that down? It may be bad for society, but since when were Democrats looking out for society?

[ZarakiKujata]

Liberals say conservatives are the sexist/racist/whatever party, accusing them of "hidden prejudices" and "code words", yet when liberals encounter someone they oppose that they see as a member of one of the left's victim classes, they lose it.

I have yet to see a liberal call Michael Steele or Clarence Thomas a nigger.

I have seen Barack called tons of nice stuff though.

[Leif]

I have yet to see a liberal call Michael Steele or Clarence Thomas a nigger.

I have seen Barack called tons of nice stuff though.

Instead, they brought Anita Hill to perjure herself in Senate confirmation hearings. Michael Steele is constantly labeled as a racist, even though he secretly wants to become a Democrat.


The party of slavery, segregation, and racial discrimination may have changed the public perception of who they hate (see: "stupid white men"), but under the skin, they're still the same ethnic minority-hating party.


Barack Obama is not a member of the opposition.

[ZarakiKujata]

Instead, they brought Anita Hill to perjure herself in Senate confirmation hearings. Michael Steele is constantly labeled as a racist, even though he secretly wants to become a Democrat.


Barack Obama is not a member of the opposition.

oh leif.

[Leif]

From 1933 through the 1960's, Republicans voted for civil rights in 96% of the votes, whereas Democrats opposed them in 80% of the votes.

Party of slavery, segregation, and racial discrimination.


Republicans have been and always will be the party of colorblindness.

[Chun Liroy]

How can you say that with a straight face when the Democrats have the first African american president?

[ZarakiKujata]

From 1933 through the 1960's, Republicans voted for civil rights in 96% of the votes, whereas Democrats opposed them in 80% of the votes.

Party of slavery, segregation, and racial discrimination.


Republicans have been and always will be the party of colorblindness.

Easy to be colorblind when 90% of the party members are white.

[ZarakiKujata]

How can you say that with a straight face when the Democrats have the first African american president?

He's said more outrageous shit with a straight face; also trolling.

I think the even more outrageous part of that claim is that Michael Steele's chief opponent for the RNC chairman position was a former dixiecrat racist.

[Chun Liroy]

I know he's trolling, but he sure does have an odd way to go about it.

[SwampdonkeyPLD]

How can you say that with a straight face when the Democrats have the first African american president?

They had a black president back when all the civil rights votes were going on?

And Zaraki govt. regulation is how big companies keep the little guys out, of course they want regulation. Look at anti-trust cases, it's never a citizen that brings the case, it's always a competitor. Big companies love big govt.

[Leif]

How can you say that with a straight face when the Democrats have the first African american president?

This is the problem with liberal thought. You have the victims and the oppressors engraved into your brain, it doesn't even matter what actions anyone takes. You say "Look, the Democrats have the first black president, they must not be racist!", completing shutting out the idea that blacks are not the ones being targeted by Democrats anymore.

Instead, blacks, for instance, are exploited by Democrats, as they constantly demand their votes, yet don't actually do anything to solve what liberals would call "black issues" like poverty, education, welfare, and promoting racial equality. Democrats have a shockingly small number of elected officials which are members of the victim classes they claim to represent.

Republicans, on the other hand, have a notable record of promoting individuals to high positions based on merits rather than skin color.

When in order to find out who the bad guys are, you start looking at who said what to whom and which side America's most influential and powerful people will take, you lose sight of who the bad guys really are.


As I have explained, which groups Democrats love and which they hate has changed over time. It naturally varies with which votes they want to buy off. When Democrats manufacture ethnic diversity, it screams "skin color is something we care about!", an obviously racist idea.

Easy to be colorblind when 90% of the party members are white.

Again, liberals only see the world in black and white. You're bad if you don't play racial politics and buy votes on the platform of giving preferential treatment to people of a certain skin color.

Just because the Democrats promise their assorted variety of victim classes (blacks, gays, feminists) the world every election, doesn't mean they are the party of racial equality.

[Leif]

He's said more outrageous shit with a straight face; also trolling.

I think the even more outrageous part of that claim is that Michael Steele's chief opponent for the RNC chairman position was a former dixiecrat racist.

And... Dixiecrats were a spin-off wing of the Democratic party and were supporting of white supremacy and segregation.

Also, why does everyone keep labeling any opposition as "trolls"? Can we please discus ideas as opposed to make-believe versions of someone's motive. I know this is asking a lot from people who love their hate speech codes, but come on.

[Correction]

Oh goody, Leif's back.

Anybody else got an unused ban ticket?

[Leif]

It's only fifty dollars to surrender your arguments and force me to stop speaking!

If I'm that painful to your egos, it's worth it!