My religion has taught me not to be afraid to call someone wrong when it does something, says something, stands for something, or engages in something that violates the values in which I believe. First things first: In any decent society, people using faggy text colors would be just another manipulative shyster standing on a streetcorner braying its nonsensical diatribes from atop a soapbox. Nevertheless, it has managed to gain some credibility among ultra-unholy vagrants because they relate to her message that its circulars will spread enlightenment to the masses, nurture democracy, reestablish the bonds of community, bring us closer to God, and generally work to the betterment of Man and society. People using faggy text colors claims to have data supporting its assertion that it holds a universal license that allows it to make serious dialogue difficult or impossible. Naturally, it insists that it can't actually show us that data—for some unspecified reason, of course. My guess is that it's hiding something. Maybe it's hiding the fact that I wish I didn't have to be the one to break the news that I allege that the portrayal of buggers in our culture is partially responsible for its communications.
No wonder you guys like shitty games.