NFL 2010 Offseason Thread

[Gadritan]

Demaryius Thomas says you only got the 2nd best WR.

Armanti Edwards says you got the 3rd best.

Yes, and Tim Tebow is the second best QB.

Armanti Edwards is applicable here as well.

[tyven]

THIS IS HOW BORED I AM AT WORK. ALSO A TESTAMENT ON HOW SERIOUS I TAKE INTERNET ARGUMENTS. SOMEONE KILL ME NOW

http://i38.tinypic.com/jb1hfb.jpg

[tyven]

Armanti Edwards says you got the 3rd best.



Armanti Edwards is applicable here as well.

fo real nigga. you guys cut jarret yet?

[Penthesilea]

Woosh'd.

This was in regards to what you quoted. How do those divisions defenses compare to one another?

[Conrad]

Armanti Edwards says you got the 3rd best.

I was hoping someone would catch that

[Chun Liroy]

Are you talking about Riley Cooper?

Because he's a big target, has sure hands, can run routes and get YAC, and was a beast in college? Cooper totaled 961 yards on 51 receptions, with nine touchdowns and an average of 18.8 yards per catch

I don't see your point. Dez Bryant was arguably the best receiver in the draft, yet I don't expect him to get more than 600 yards, and maybe 7 TDs, as the #3 receiver, yet you think a 5th round draft pick will make an impact in the "Leagues best receiving corp"?

[Gadritan]

fo real nigga. you guys cut jarret yet?

Despite running as a starter early in training camp, ESPN's Pat Yasinskas writes there is a "good chance [Jarrett] is gone before the preseason is over."

The Panthers are reportedly "starting to think" LSU rookie Brandon LaFell is the best choice to start opposite Steve Smith. LaFell has impressed during camp and received first-team snaps at practice in Thursday.

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com...make-panthers/

[Conrad]

I don't see your point. Dez Bryant was arguably the best receiver in the draft, yet I don't expect him to get more than 600 yards, and maybe 7 TDs, as the #3 receiver, yet you think a 5th round draft pick will make an impact in the "Leagues best receiving corp"?

I don't think either of us said the Eagles had the best receivers, but that we're in the discussion for Top 5.

[Penthesilea]

THIS IS HOW BORED I AM AT WORK. ALSO A TESTAMENT ON HOW SERIOUS I TAKE INTERNET ARGUMENTS. SOMEONE KILL ME NOW

http://i38.tinypic.com/jb1hfb.jpg

Lovely, but I said entire receiving corp. That includes out of the backfield. 27 > 26 last I counted that high.

[tyven]

so you guys had 3 receiving touchdowns out of the backfield and dallas had 1? that really cements your previous statement about them having a "better better" production.

[Chun Liroy]

I don't think either of us said the Eagles had the best receivers, but that we're in the discussion for Top 5.

I'd venture to say they're most likely tops in the NFC East and probably a close second behind the Colts.

.

[Penthesilea]

I don't see your point. Dez Bryant was arguably the best receiver in the draft, yet I don't expect him to get more than 600 yards, and maybe 7 TDs, as the #3 receiver, yet you think a 5th round draft pick will make an impact in the "Leagues best receiving corp"?

Because a corps is a group and we're talking about their sum total contributions.

[Gadritan]

Cowboys:

TOTAL PASSING YARDS 4287
PASSING (Comp) 347
PASSING TD 26

Eagles:

TOTAL PASSING YARDS 4089
PASSING (Comp) 335
PASSING TD 27

Soooo....is your argument based on 1 TD > 198yrds now?

[Conrad]

.

first = second, herp derp

Either way, I'm still saying top 5.

[Chun Liroy]

Then why don't you just say quarterback stats then? Especially considering when analysts take into account receiving corp, they talk about the top 3 WR and the TE, and maybe a 4th WR/RB.

[Chun Liroy]

first = second, herp derp

Either way, I'm still saying top 5.

"Close second." I still don't see how 1 spot is changing anything about my point in that post.

[Penthesilea]

Then why don't you just say quarterback stats then? Especially considering when analysts take into account receiving corp, they talk about the top 3 WR and the TE, and maybe a 4th WR/RB.

Because it's a long season where depth goes a long ways. hey, I'm just happy I can have this argument, instead of crying about Pinkston and FredEx and the James Thrash's of years past.

[Gadritan]

Here's the tie breaker.

DAL: FIELD GOALS 20/31
PHI: FIELD GOALS 32/37

[Chun Liroy]

I still don't see the point of including a perosn that's never going to see playing time.

[Penthesilea]

Cowboys:

TOTAL PASSING YARDS 4287
PASSING (Comp) 347
PASSING TD 26

Eagles:

TOTAL PASSING YARDS 4089
PASSING (Comp) 335
PASSING TD 27

Soooo....is your argument based on 1 TD > 198yrds now?

My argument is based around the fact that scoring wins games and yes 198 yds << 1 TD. Also consider the fact that Low-throw McBlow created about 100 incompletions a game and yeah the potential of this receiving corp has yet to be reached.