NSFW Sigs and Avatars

[Sonomaa]

For a long time weve been against NSFW sigs and avatars, keeping people who browse from work safe from all the evil nudity.

However there has been a call to drop that net and allow NSFW sigs and avatars (nudity and naughty things, gross still applies).

What say you BG peoples, rock teh voet.

[Chun Liroy]

inb4 numbers, also no poll if you intended on there to be one.

[Lucavi]

Freedom of expression, ect. We all know what we're getting into when we look at BG at work.

Honestly, that's half the fun.

[Vandalhart]

I don't care either way, I just don't want the site to get banned here at work. Would there be a way for maybe someone to flag their own signature or avatar as NSFW and place a filter for those that would like to be safe?

How about an auto spoiler function for signatures that are flagged as NSFW. Is something like that possible?

[Sonomaa]

inb4 numbers, also no poll if you intended on there to be one.

theres a poll, are you not seeing it?

[Antithesis]

I want to see Numbers' amazing Sig powers at work with this restriction off.

[Overburn]

I don't care either way, I just don't want the site to get banned here at work. Would there be a way for maybe someone to flag their own signature or avatar as NSFW and place a filter for those that would like to be safe?

How about an auto spoiler function for signatures that are flagged as NSFW. Is something like that possible?

With just a Yes/No option, I voted No, but if there's some kind of restriction like this, I wouldn't really care.

[Alleya]

I have a totally crazy idea that people who browse from work can invest in



It's almost as if someone already thought of this!!!1

[AidenCarby]

I want that deadpool picture you have :/

[Isiolia]

I say keep it safe for work, unless there'd be a way to toggle such sigs/avatars without having to turn off images entirely (or whatever).

[Insanecyclone]

Keep NSFW material in sigs in spoilers but how will that work for avatars?

[Tajin]

Go for it, adblock and forum options ftw.

[Gulkeeva]

yeah a on/off option for NSFW sigs/avatars (technically already is one) would be good, that way people can use semi NSFW/NSFW'ish sigs/avatars !

[Ragns]

I have a totally crazy idea that people who browse from work can invest in



It's almost as if someone already thought of this!!!1

Or log off while browsing BG from work like I do since avatars and sigs are already disabled for guests.

[Bikpik]

I just turn off avatars and sigs while at work, seems to work for me.

[Correction]

So wait people care about tits in sigs but not about whether or not sigs are 7-8MB animated gifs?

[Jefe]

Don't be throwing monkey wrenches around, it's fine as is. Man, if you really feel the need to have dicks, tits, and gang bangs around then you have bigger fish to fry.

[Woozie]

I vote for keep NSFW images in sig clearly marked and spoiler tagged. And no NSFW imaged in Avatars. I think that's the way it already is, so I guess I'm voting to keep things as they are.

[Sonomaa]

my goal is when we switch to VB4 have someone code an option to toggle a second sig/avatar system that is entirely NSFW.

if toggled dirty, you see dirty, if toggled not dirty, you see normal

[Ksandra]

I vote for keep NSFW images in sig clearly marked and spoiler tagged. And no NSFW imaged in Avatars.

^ this because honestly, why is it so important to have boobs in your avatar? I'd rather not get someone fired.