spam caused 9/11
Tits!
GTFO!
spam caused 9/11
9/11 is nothing compared to what spam caused in Pompeii.
That's not funny, spam killed my brother that way
Saw that one in spam, numbers... some of us lurk there as well as out here.
/shrug
BG has it's own communities, multiple ones. I don't have a problem with keeping them separate, and I think it's best for those that browse from work. It may not be spam at all, but whoever is pushing for this doesn't have the best interest of the board in mind.
Personally, I have found that IAS is one of the least offensive sections of this board. But the point is still that some people aren't happy with their divided off section and want to screw it up for everyone else just because they are 14 year-olds without jobs that want to be able to look cool on the internet. If I blamed spam wrongly as opposed to general, then please accept my deepest apologies, but I still don't care about the difference between spam, general or any other forum I don't browse.
Where's Isla with the reichban when you need it. ; ;
That and that, honestly. To Aerides' point, I think driving out people based on an unnecessary policy-change is just as bad as crying censorship and leaves it up to a matter of practicing exclusion for the sake of gross ariel rebel tits. Had to!
Anyhow, you nailed it here, TBR. I found out about this forum because of FFXI, but the reason this forum became part of my daily routine has nothing to do with the actual XI forums and at most I'll check out screens, .dats and fanart threads in those relevant sections. As noted countless times already, one person's experience and situation doesn't really mean much in the scope of the entire forum, but I simply think the community is what keeps people here and I agree with what you're saying. I see no reason to shrink instead of broaden.
Wow this thread is still alive?
Probably would've been better if people read the quote and realized I never mentioned nsfw but that stupid sonomaa rule about not showing more than half of a chick cleavage in an avatar/sig. Yes the poll is very accurate as the vote for tits actually mean tits.
<--- Anyway fuck the sonomaa rule.
to be fair, you never mentioned that it was strictly about tits, and this is in the convo you posted:
"Ragns: KI shouldn't allow more porn than BG" definitely implies nsfw vs. just showing more cleavage.
If that was the case probably would have been a good thing to mention it way earlier.
Even if you originally just meant tits, Ragns, the OP makes it clear that this is about NSFW in general, and not tits specifically.
I wonder if KI has problems with people reading their forum at work
I meant for the thread's sake. i.e. let the posters know what it was about vs. making it sounded like you wanted naked titties like KI. I'm not saying you didn't mean it, I'm saying you made yourself look bad by not explaining it earlier. I'm glad you're explaining it now though.