I've been too busy today watching Independence Day on USA to give a shit about Hawaii's problems.
I've been too busy today watching Independence Day on USA to give a shit about Hawaii's problems.
Sure, a 6 foot wave displaces a ton of water, but it's not going to get that far up shore and be toppling buildings like many of us thought (hoped for).
Uh, it's going to carry inland a good distance...
Pretty sure 6-foot waves hit parts of hawaii all the time.
I saw point break.
I don't care if that was australia.
Spoiler alert: waves aren't 2 dimensional.
A 6' x 1' x 100' wave hitting a beach carries as much energy as a couple cars, a 6' x 100' x 100' wave is a traffic jam being pushed by a freight train.
Care to explain where you got these numbers and coinciding analogies?
A typical wind wave is traveling at 20~30 mph tops, and displaces several tons of water.
A tsunami is traveling at 500~ mph before reaching shallower waters, and displaces hundreds of tons of water or more.
Not to be a dick or anything but I hope we don't get this "DONATE $$$ to Chile!" bullshit like we had for Haiti...
Well that was anticlimactic.
Well Chile is far more wealthy than Haiti is. They have the necessary funds to rebuild, mostly on their on their own. They'll get help probably, but they don't need it to survive.
Besides I wouldn't donate to the Red Cross anyway for anything. The money never gets theres, or takes months when they need it yesterday.
Triple spoiler counterplay since you triggered my trap card: Hawaii had almost half a day of warning, and I'm not sure exactly what the wavelength of this particular tsunami was, but know enough to say it isn't the same as your typical 6' surfable wave which breaks and recedes immediately.
A tsunami will rush inland further, but how much further depends on everything from the angle of the shoreline relative to the origin of the wave/path it took to get there, the water temperature, the topography of the shoreline, how much energy it dissipates against the continental shelf, and so forth.
They've had a ton of aftershocks man, almost 80+, and even Argentina got hit by a 6.3 quake because of the Chilie quake apparently. http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquak...quakes_all.php
Thank goodness Chilean structures are built so well, more steel between the columns. There was one stupid thing I heard their president say though, "Even if hospitals are damaged, use them." Seriously though, with 80+ aftershocks with a range of 5.1 to 6.9 magnitudes, I wouldn't walk in ANY unstable structure that's damaged...
Keep in mind, the epicenter of Chile's earthquake(8.8 magnitude) was 115 kilometers off shore from Conception, Chile...and 200ish kilometers off shore from Santiago at 35 kilometers below the surface of the Earth.
The epicenter of Haiti's earthquake(7.0 magnitude) was 15 kilometers on land away from Port Au Prince and 13 kilometers below the surface of the earth. If Chile's one was closer to the capital, it would look like 100s of nukes blew up everything. There also wouldn't have been 53 countries/territories affected by the Tsunami warnings either though.
But anyways, it's good to see government and emergency care is functioning immediately after the earthquake. Chile also tells the international community that they don't need any outside help or donations for now, so don't worry about donating, unless they get hit by another GUMBO quake soon again or something. If anything though, I'd expect the Latin American, and Latino Global population to step up and do charity fund raisers this time though.
Update: According to USGS, Chile has experienced 100 aftershocks between 5.1-6.9 magnitudes.
FUCK YEAH CHILE
I didn't know you could learn so much about quakes and tsunamis from WebMD.
OH NO GUYS, DONATE TO PEOPLE WHO NEVER RETURN THE FAVOR!
Some people at BG are just the master of circular arguments.
"THAT WAVE WILL BE SUPER DESTRUCTIVE."
*Hawaii barely feels the impact*
"WELL I DON'T KNOW HOW STRONG THAT ONE WAS BUT THE ONE I WAS TALKING OF WOULD BE."
or
"CHECK OUT THIS NEW SICKNESS WE WILL ALL DIE"
'Actually, according to this link it has low mortality and high survival rate and has an LD50 of 10,000,000.'
"NO DATS WUT MEDIA WANT U TO BELIEVE"
or
"THIS IS ALL BECAUSE OF LIBERALS"
Look. Chile got fucked up by a bad Earthquake. Donate or don't. Help or don't. When a big bad wave hits a place and destroys it and you start hearing about it, feel free to start speculating about the destructive power of waves.
Theorizing just because you know some shit about physics and then being completely wrong about it just makes you a tool - not just any tool, mind you, an ignorant one.
What's with the butthurt people in this thread that don't understand the concept of donating?