Idk if this has been said already in this thread, but Ahmedinnajihad or w/e his name, isn't he the same dude who wanted to visit Ground Zero when he visited the USA in 2007 to give some pee pee speech at Columbia University?
Also isn't he the one who denies the Holocaust and wants to wipe out all of Israel when he has some Jewish ancestry himself? Why should we give a fuck about this dude, he obviously is a joker, I hope someone snipes his ass, along with Ayatollah Kamehamehameni or w/e his name is.
I've not been here long enough, but one thing's for sure that there are a lot of fag sympathizers on this forum and everyone loves using the n-word etc just cause they know someone who's black.
He never said that.and wants to wipe out all of Israel
No, I'm saying he's a hypocrite because he wanted to visit Ground Zero in '07 to go pay respects or something, and now he's saying 9/11 didn't happen. I mean wtf he think he is, if I ever see him, I'm going to to pick the world up and drop it on his fu@#ing head, YEAHH!!
wtf is a pee pee speech?
[Link removed]By Thor! That's brilliant, of course engineers design buildings to be jet proof, just in case of incidents like the 9/11 attacks, let's move the whole conspiracy back to the fuckign freemasons while we're at it, and tie in how they're preventing the truth about JFK, the moon landing, or area 51 from reaching the public as well!
I'm trying to overcome a sinus infection, and you made me laugh so hard it restarted my coughing fits, yet I honestly don't mind the slight pain due to how hearty the laughter was.
They obviously didn't make it down through the parts where THERE WAS A BIG FUCKING HOLE IN THE BUILDING though, perhaps there were other routes down in the HUGE FUCKING THORDAMNED FLOORS of the building?This isn't even bringing up the fact you have survivors in Tower 2 who were above the crash levels safely make it down through this supposed 1000+ temperature with various eye-witness accounts stating the floors below were in normal conditions. There has never been an instance, before or after 9/11, where steel framed towers collapsed due to fires.
So is gravity while we're at it, I mean, thinking that the 11 floors/25 floors above the damaged sections would keep applying pressure rather than obligingly distributing their load elsewhere, perhaps on the magical fucking fairy elephants flying around in your universe... that's just absurd.I never stated the fall of the towers were due to controlled detonations or a secret guberment plot. My point is that the whole "Pancake Theory" is just as flawed.
http://static.thehollywoodgossip.com...gh_313x492.jpg
http://www.dietriffic.com/wp-content...3/laughing.jpg
before this thread i had never heard of Cadsuane. after this thread i have learned he is the best non spam poster on all of BG
Yeah, Cads is generally pretty spot on, and #123 on the previous page contains enough win, that if win were burning jet fuel, it could have taken down the twin towers after the structural supports were weakened by the impacts of airliners.
I, for one, would have.
Also: Firas, I actually know a guy you would have loved, goes by the handle Therumancer.
He's known for excessively wordy posts which came to be known as "The Therumancer Doctrines", about how christianity and islam will never coexist peacefully, so one or the other needs to be exterminated asap.
He mentions a lot of the shit you do there, but while we knew he was crazy, and took him with a grain of salt... I honestly think you try to actively disbelieve any version of outside events which conflicts with what you've come to think is the truth.
Don't feel bad, most people do this to some degree or another, reality is a big scary place, but I'm sure Allah will save you from it.
I think specious was correct, though using it as an adjective for red herring is redundant and far more indicative of pompous verbosity. I confess that I learned it a couple of weeks ago from a qualiasoup youtube and I've been waiting for a chance to whip it out and sound british.
So should I migrate to spam now? Am I cool enough for that yet?
no
no offense
Hah, bazing!
Spurious is more of a statement indended to insult, offend, sully, or mislead, specious is one that is out of use or obscure.
Least that's what the dictionary in my head says, I only said I would have preferred spurious because it amuses me to espouse agreement for things emphatically without investigating the portent of my overeager statements.
No matter the truth biased or otherwise...
You can't fix stupid.
Sorry, too much info suggests these buildings didn't collapse from those jets alone. Numerous accounts of explosions felt under the tower and on the street levels just before the first plane hitting, and before the first tower collapsed. Flawed pancake theories. How the jets @the Pentagon and Shanksville magically "disappear". NORAD failing four times in one day...it's NORAD, go look up how many failures they had prior to 9/11. WTC 7 magically falling. (out of grief I guess?) The core columns at the base of the rubble...
http://www.bollyn.com/public/Cut_column_in_context.jpg
(perfect example of how to knock down a skyscraper via controlled demolition)
Also the traces of Thermite found. But hey, I'm just another crazy conspiracy theorist, right?
Conspiracy crazies have been pulling shit out of their asses for years, but when you have so much proof, outside of that circle, to suggest otherwise? I mean, c'mon.
But, believe what you want.