
Originally Posted by
FailureMidgard
Not going to quote all that, apologies if I miss something. Let's start with your botting argument. I'll go ahead and extend this to say that in 99.9% of shells (even 6man groups) the "leaders" put more work in than anyone else. When I was on Midgard and had shitty gear, I organized a salvage group. It was mostly good friends, with a few outside people that became good friends. I never took more than anyone else, and was pretty much as fair as I could be, but even in a group with nothing but good friends (4 of which I'd know for 4 years), I still put in far more work, reading through pages of threads on BG, researching what dropped where and how it all worked, etc. During the run I'd sit there with multiple sites open to reference and make sure we were doing the right thing. What's the point of this story? Your botting analogy is bogus, and is going back to a different issue, that the "leader", official or not, will -ALWAYS- put more work and effort in than the members. Maybe we should just say only LS leaders have a right to complain. No, I don't actually feel this way - but being a leader pretty much blows, and there have definitely been a lot of times where I got quite annoyed at having to hold people's hands through shit. It's not quite as bad as leeching though...
Anyway, going back to the botting thing, a lot of bots are bought with gil, and presumably every LS member is losing payouts to cover that gil. Sure, new members join later and "profit" off of the shell having the bot - but again, this isn't a botting specific thing. New members join successful non-botting shells and ride their success also. We can just hate on new members, but really, it's the fault of veteran members quitting that even makes new members a necessity.
But I don't see how any of this relates to WoE. I still feel that if someone goes to WoE with plans to sit back and watch and lot coins, they have a malicious intent. Is it possible for someone in a LS to act this way also? Sure, and I'll fucking kick them out of any shell I'm a leader in. But most people don't sit here and plan to fuck their LS leaders over (at least, not in my experience).
Same thing goes for account sharing. You can be malicious about it, or you can avoid that. I had a friend who barely logged on for a good 1-2 years, yet kept his account active, and he basically "gave" it to me, but said he may come back and didn't know. I used his account for a long time, leveled his jobs and subjobs, got him gear, etc. I also made use of his account as an Aery mule, as extra Abyssea stones back when I needed them, to help me finish relic trials faster, etc. He came back about 1-2 months ago. I don't resent him because I leveled shit for him. He didn't fake-quit in order to get me to do shit for him. There isn't malicious intent here. On the other hand, if he had said he was quitting, I got the account and leveled shit in 2 weeks, then he came back and changed his PW on me (I still have his PW and also made use of his char since him coming back to finish my Masamune), ya, it'd be pretty asshole, but I guess most friends don't do that to each other? Do you really know someone who quit with the sole intent of having others better their character for them?
I'm not even going to touch your points spent issue. Sounds to me like whatever LS you're referring to has a shit-tastic item distribution system that should be evaluated. Yea, we would give E-Bodies and the like to new members too, because all of our older members are pretty decked out...but the few items the older members wanted pretty much went to older members (D-Ring, Shadow Ring, Valhalla). We never had newer members complain, we never had older members complain...I guess it worked out pretty fairly. If you're saying assume that a distribution system has a flaw, it's wrong to take advantage of that flaw...I agree to a point. I think a member should point out the flaw to the leaders, explain why it's bad, and if the leaders refuse to acknowledge or fix it, then fuck em and take advantage of it all you want. On the other hand, if you try to snake in and profit for yourself...well, that's fucked up and wrong. But in the end, get a better distribution system.
Your PW example is odd, and is probably one of the few times that I'd agree with you on it being in a similar boat to this WoE mechanic. As far as I know (sorry, I could be wrong), no shell that has killed PW has kept it claimed through the entire final form (I know we didn't), and instead expects it to go white on Astral Flows. As that is a common strategy, it does perhaps fall into a category of essentially piggy-backing off of others. On the other hand, AV you have 1 shot at, and unless you have 2 zerg allies up and ready, once he regens from bracelet mode (at least at 80), it was pretty much over, so taking it at 20% when a shell wipes is different. But you're now moving from very general ideas to one very specific mob that I'd be surprised to hear has even been popped once since the level 85 increase.
And no, you don't piss me off...I share information to help people out, I post on and read these forums because it is enjoyable to me. While you may be benefiting off of my time, or another posters time, you are not depriving us of what we were doing with our time. Me and my LS/friends still got everything we expected to get when we put the time in, and I willingly came here and spent further time posting (and received some form of enjoyment/entertainment while doing so, otherwise I wouldn't post here).
Finally, I didn't say you're asking too much, I said you're expecting too much. Wanting it to be the case, and honestly expecting everyone to be crystal clear with their concepts are 2 entirely different things, and I feel it is unrealistic to expect every poster to be so clear. I've found while typing this post, that my last definition or whatnot was not clear enough - it is not just intent to profit off of someone else's actions, but that along with denying them their expected outcome that makes it a sore point. And I still feel that most of your original examples are nowhere near as similar as you want them to be. I will grant PW, but that is literally the only NM (and really, if there's an accepted strategy that doesn't involve letting it go white, I'll say PW doesn't even count) that this is the case for, and you can't make a general statement about taking an NM someone wipes too, and find 1 example where it fits, then claim that your original statement is thus correct. It just doesn't work that way when 99% of the NMs it does not in fact fit.
Again, sorry if I missed any specific points, or if I rambled off topic a bit, but I think most people have every right to be upset at WoE leeches. I also agree with whichever posters said if someone comes in and actually earns a chest - power to them. It'd annoy me still, but I don't think it would be -wrong- of them to do so. It is however, quite wrong to go in, do nothing, and lot coins.