Final Form Magian Weapons

[Nightfyre]

I see "weapons", but I don't see an "all" attached to that. Plausible assumption, but not one I'd throw around without evidence to back it.

[Vodou]

I see "weapons", but I don't see an "all" attached to that. Plausible assumption, but not one I'd throw around without evidence to back it.

You have me lost.

All is implied by the context.

"The impending version update will usher in new trials allowing adventurers to take weapons already augmented via prior Magian accomplishments and enhance them further. Needless to say, new trial sequences for relic and mythic weapons will be included among these."

They don't say NEXT impending version update. Implied, although technically there are many impending version updates.

They don't say ALL adventurers. Implied, although they might, mean only some adventurers.

They don't say ALL relics and ALL mythics. Implied, although they might mean some.

People aren't expected to have to write as if they are talking to lawyers. Try reading as if someone is not trying to trick you in a court of law.

[Red Demon Taoist]

Sorry for the confusion, stupid

And I'm sorry that you're a sniveling child.

People seemed confused. My comment hardly warranted your ad hominems/bullshit.
Also blatant insecurity and feelings of inadequacy.

[tonystigma]

Goddamn you are smug as shit. Seriously, step away from the internet and look in a mirror for a minute.

[ZhiGaruda]

And I'm sorry that you're a sniveling child.

People seemed confused. My comment hardly warranted your ad hominems/bullshit.
Also blatant insecurity and feelings of inadequacy.

Yes, I am the sniveling child, yet you are the one who is blaming a corporation for your inability to comprehend a few lines of text, citing them as a constant disappointment. Pot, kettle, etc

[Max™]

Note: I misread, and was incorrect, Bonesplitter only gets to Dmg 100, which is still badass, nonetheless, my bad.

[urat]

Note: I misread, and was incorrect, Bonesplitter only gets to Dmg 100, which is still badass, nonetheless, my bad.

Such a perfect name for it too, it doesnt just kill you, it crushes your very bone structure into a shape unrecognizable as a corpse

[Malacite]

I wonder just how much further those +DMG weapons can be pushed too...

[Sho]

Ahh I see. I'll get the Def Down Sword done in about 3~ ish days so I can test just in case. Might be nice for soloing and such to conserve MP from F. Roar.

Decided to parse the last 80 add effect procs on crabs for the final stage of the weapon:

Additional Effect Status Inflictions

Shokox

Melee Effect           # Procs     # Hits     Raw Proc %    # Restricted Hits   Restricted Proc %
Defense Down                82       1242         6.60 %                  401             20.45 %

The weapon was Soulsaber D39, Delay 234 Add Effect: Weakens Defense+5. No effect was over written by itself, but I assume it would be by spells. Not as good as I was expecting but eh...

[promethius]

not sure if it was posted already but what is the proc rate of oat weapons and is the latent always up on the dmg.

[Sho]

not sure if it was posted already but what is the proc rate of oat weapons and is the latent always up on the dmg.

Posted a few times already. OAT is around 40~45%, latent D is up always.

[Red Demon Taoist]

Yes, I am the sniveling child, yet you are the one who is blaming a corporation for your inability to comprehend a few lines of text, citing them as a constant disappointment. Pot, kettle, etc

I said something to try to help others who seemed confused by the "80 augments".

Notice how I simply shared what I thought they meant instead of throwing childish insults at them for absolutely no reason.

Since you decided out of nowhere that I was confused, which for some reason meant that I should be insulted, I fired back by letting you know exactly what that makes you look like: a childish douche.

[urat]

Halfway done my Athame, currently on the Arcana/Hippogryph stage, my god Black Triple Stars was a giant massive fucking bitch AGHHH

Took me 47 in game nights of camping to kill those bats three times, in total IRL of two goddamn weeks. The other two NMs thankfully I was able to do in almost a single sitting. Luckily I have the HQ swimming body from the summer event awhile back that teleports me to Purgonogo island, where my third NM spawns. I just sat and camped her there for a few days until I finished, then warped out.

Now I have 400 arcana and 300 Hippos on my plate, as much as Id like to be annoyed at SE I have been bored lately so this dagger presents to me a nice past time, and Im thankful for it.

Word of advice to fellow thieves and dancer's looking to upgrade this dagger, don't get discouraged by Black Triple Stars! Its a tough NM but just keep thinking about the sexy dagger you'll end up with and you can persevere!

[Karbuncle]

This is probably old knews, but i added this to wiki...

for trial 290 (Axe) you need to kill 400 Lizards, I recently found out Raptors works for this, Wiki had it listed as actual <Lizards>, the little brown baleful-gaze turds, turns out it might be the entire lizard family... Efts, Lizards, etc.

Since most trials specify one family, 300 Puks, 200 Qutrub, etc, i thought 400 lizards meant ... 400 Lizards, not 400 Lizard family mobs.

yay?

[Khelek]

Isn't the 400 mob stage always mob group and the 300 stage mob type?

[Karbuncle]

Its what i get for using Wiki.

Also why i add those "Probably old news" disclosures to these posts.

Fweh.

[Rionel]

http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y23.../kurodachi.jpg

Probably real old news for everyone, but I'm happy.

[Malacite]

Grats! Still working on mine ><

[Laynton]

One of my friends asked a question about Teiwaz staffs that really got thinking b/c I really didnt know the answer. With the possible augments of "Thunder Affinity: MAcc +4 MAB +4" or whatever the stats are, are these staffs better the elem. staffs?

Friend said they heard that they were better. Anyone have anything to back this up or say otherwise? Anyone done personal testing by chance?

Other than that 1 thing is that since they all have the same name no matter what aug you put on them macroing becomes a real bitch.

[Cymmina]

One of my friends asked a question about Teiwaz staffs that really got thinking b/c I really didnt know the answer. With the possible augments of "Thunder Affinity: MAcc +4 MAB +4" or whatever the stats are, are these staffs better the elem. staffs?

Friend said they heard that they were better. Anyone have anything to back this up or say otherwise? Anyone done personal testing by chance?

Other than that 1 thing is that since they all have the same name no matter what aug you put on them macroing becomes a real bitch.

Affinity: Magic Damage +3, Affinity: Magic Accuracy +1 has the magic accuracy of a NQ elemental staff (we think) and better damage than a HQ staff (+20% damage instead of +15%). Try reading through the rest of the thread for more information.