
Originally Posted by
Acturus
We'll probably get into a semantics argument, but I would have an easier time believing what you say if his show was one-sided towards a particular political affiliation.
He's made a career out of being funny. He gets paid to be funny. He doesn't get paid to be "a liberal".
As far as I can tell he's also never pushed a liberal belief at the expense of being funny either.
Ergo, he's a funny guy who has liberal views, and not a liberal who is funny. He doesn't identify himself by his political affiliation, but by his trade.