Kuya

[Shiroikage]

and once again i must make the point that i don't think anyone enjoys reading these kinds of exchanges.

i find these very entertaining for some bizarre reason

[Kyo]

I need a movie I can download or stream in DVD quality, that I have not seen.

[_chuchu]

you should get on my ventttttttttttttttttt

EDIT:

COMMA PERM

by vent, you meant horse, right?

[MF Perm tha Fineass]

I would but I have to yell at these kids and co-ordinate with my team

[Faris]

i missed the thread

[Kyo]

Awww yeah found a dvd quality From Paris With Love, this movie better pwn. Also what the fuck, no DVD copies from 3 month old movies, silver screen you are slippin.

[Demosthenes]

[quote]So, fourth, fifth time I've spelled something out for you? Gonna be a constant theme I think.[quote]
Sorry, I am not big on attempting to decipher statements that fail to carry weight or bear fruition of what they truly mean.

You outlined a dichotomy between feminism and feminists to purport the notion that while feminism is unassailable, feminists aren't. The only way that sort of works is with a criminally oversimplified definition of feminism as egalitarianism, probably drawing from the second wave. If that's not what you were actually arguing, then I sincerely apologize for giving you the benefit of the doubt on that one.

I draw from no particular wave. I draw from my personal belief that a woman is my equal in all rights and deserves to be able to do anything I am allowed to do. It is a combination of more than one wave. I understand that society as a whole is patriarchal. I have been raised in it, and despite my yearnings for equality. Some of my thoughts are hard coded by society itself from the get go. I am more than aware of the waves. I am also aware of the shortsightedness of some waves.

See, in reality that's wrong, if only because you're skirting a no true scottsman fallacy (ie. "feminists are being twats? then they're not really following feminism")

The idea of the "no true scotsman" fallacy implies that it is always right. Which in its own right is a microcosm of a fallacy. Someone said earlier in this thread that, "Hate masquerading as feminism is not really feminism". It is fact. Anything that belies more than equality is a show of kyriarchy, and is not feminism.

but also because I can make a wild guess that I know more about feminist theory of various schools than you do and point out exactly what parts of the codified philosophy are suspect. Which I'm not gonna do by the way, just so you can deliberately fail to understand them and continue to pretend you're winning this argument.

You should have done just that. My call to arms with you was your misconstrued and backwards way of claiming to support feminism, which, while you may, was worded in the most backwards way. Hence, my focus on your inability to communicate proper while claiming virile tact.

[Kyo]

Decent enough movie.

[Day]

Demos shut the fuck up already.

[Demosthenes]

or what Day?

[Day]

I didn't say or.

[Day]

subtext nigga

[Day]

is this demos the retarded poster that wears retarded hats or just the retarded poster demos? i get them confused so.

[Demosthenes]

I don't know. I'm certain there is some subtext somewhere to elaborate.

[Charismatic]

is this demos the retarded poster that wears retarded hats or just the retarded poster demos? i get them confused so.

Retarded hat Demos

[Day]

Maybe the hat is in the way of his subtext view.

[Demosthenes]

Not like it is that hard.

[Day]

Is that what she said?

[Demosthenes]

That's all she said.

[#686578]

I don't understand how you came in slobbering all over my dick when my first post wasn't until page 7

Wat

Is this ultra inferior settings?