can't spell self masturbatory without s, p, a, and m
can't spell self masturbatory without s, p, a, and m
lol
Protip: Keeping the "I don't care it's the internet" card in reserve, besides being a tired cliche, doesn't really work when you start the altercation with lots of in-group out-group horse shit while leaning on a cheerleader screeching gtfo of our ivory tower.
Also now that you're on the defensive, just remember who it was that started this gong show motherfucker.
Oh I know what the fuck I started, if you presume I am backing down over the fact that you are dense, then for the nth time in the past 24 hours, you are wrong again. As for the card you claim I should reserve, it is another fact. With the exception of lin, all spamers do nothing but entertain me.
I am saddened that you have chosen to stop riding the english language in all hillariously stupid ways.
No, not really. And it does, because in many cases I do think feminism is fucking ridiculous, nor should anyone believe that it is an ideology to be taken to absurd extremes. Speaking of which, I'm still considering a (civil) reply to your post in general on the same subject.
Feminism is never retarded, feminists however can be.
That is why I will always laugh at the idea of feminism being anything but terrible.
Aside from not retarded that is.
See, if I had mod powers he'd have been banned by now
You mean equality by the books
Can't even make the joke properly, heh
So, fourth, fifth time I've spelled something out for you? Gonna be a constant theme I think.
You outlined a dichotomy between feminism and feminists to purport the notion that while feminism is unassailable, feminists aren't. The only way that sort of works is with a criminally oversimplified definition of feminism as egalitarianism, probably drawing from the second wave. If that's not what you were actually arguing, then I sincerely apologize for giving you the benefit of the doubt on that one.
See, in reality that's wrong, if only because you're skirting a no true scottsman fallacy (ie. "feminists are being twats? then they're not really following feminism"), but also because I can make a wild guess that I know more about feminist theory of various schools than you do and point out exactly what parts of the codified philosophy are suspect. Which I'm not gonna do by the way, just so you can deliberately fail to understand them and continue to pretend you're winning this argument.
and what was the point again? was saying something (that's also true) that's in line with what I said supposed to somehow discredit me in some way?