
Originally Posted by
Cadsuane
So, fourth, fifth time I've spelled something out for you? Gonna be a constant theme I think.
You outlined a dichotomy between feminism and feminists to purport the notion that while feminism is unassailable, feminists are. The only way that sort of works is with a criminally oversimplified definition of feminism as egalitarianism, probably drawing from the second wave. If that's not what you were actually arguing, then I sincerely apologize for giving you the benefit of the doubt on that one.
See, in reality that's wrong, if only because you're skirting a no true scottsman fallacy (ie. "feminists are being twats? then they're not really following feminism"), but also because I can make a wild guess that I know more about feminist theory of various schools than you do and point out exactly what parts of the codified philosophy are suspect. Which I'm not gonna do by the way, just so you can deliberately fail to understand them and continue to pretend you're winning this argument.