Guess this means we can't ever have a female president.
Sorry - there's a difference between reporting on a very obscure cleric in Iran making an obviously retarded claim versus something more substantial that may show Iran (or Muslims) in a negative light.
Coverage of, for instance, the infighting in Nigeria between Muslims and Christians is suitable news, and by no means shows either faction in a positive light (nor is that really the intent, rather to direct attention to a very serious issue); but again I ask what's the point of such an article? Anything but antagonizing Iran (and/or Muslims)?
To keep people informed of the dangers of blind faith and the demonization of science would be my guess.
http://www.blaghag.com/2010/04/in-na...-my-boobs.html
Knowledge is power.
That bitch has a huge nose. I mean.. her boobs are ok and all but i'm too distracted by how freakish her face looks with a nose like that.
Pissed off by a quote from a obscure cleric you say? Then how about all the times that their own president has denied that the holocaust ever happened? Is Mahmoud Ahmadinejad non-obscure / batshit-crazy-claim enough for you?
I dislike Ahmadinejad as much as I possibly dislike anyone out there...but find me the unadulterated quote where he denies the Holocaust. I'm sure you'll be able to, because that's such a common belief -- all that I've seen through transcripts thus far are his claiming that the Holocaust "didn't happen as people say it happened" and rejection of the "total number of Jewish people killed."
I'll agree with you though - that's stupid -- even considering the modified "Holocaust didn't happen as they say it did." If not more, at least on three counts:
1) Historical inaccuracy
2) No head of state should be so foolish
3) Minimizing the traumatic events of the Holocaust is in no way endearing
http://www.foxnews.com/world/2010/04...-cause-quakes/
They did publish it, though.
You guys are missing a point I've made abundantly clear: I'm not saying in any shape or form Muslims are 'perfect' -- we're just as screwed up as everyone else. I'm saying this article serves barely any purpose outside of antagonizing Iranians (and partially Muslims given that it's a pseudo-cleric they're quoting)
Having been raised Catholic i have to say that the only major religion that seems not to be completely full of horseshit (to me) is Buddhism. At least they never started any wars because they met some people with different beliefs, I think...
Church of the Flying Spaghetti Monster.
Sri Lanka I don't know shit about, but I thought that the Japanese weren't Buddhist then? Didn't the Emperor declare the "Divine mandate, or mandate of heaven" or some shit. Basically said that he himself was god, or at least of divine origin, which when they were forced to obey him as god that would technically make them not Buddhist.
Also, one of the requirements when Japan surrendered to the US was that the Emperor had to declare that he was not divine.
Here's a couple articles quoting him as saying it never happened. These were before he backpedaled and tried to say the halloucaust wasn't as bad as people made it out to be.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/4527142.stm
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/0..._n_291056.html
Japanese religion is an amalgamation of Buddhist and Shinto beliefs, the Emperor's divinity originates from Shinto, but there were Zen masters in Japan who encouraged the population to support the war.
since I live in california, can't i just test this theory by banging some loose muslim woman and see if the bay bridge collapses again?