Bomb scare in NYC.. sudden patriotism spike inc

[Plow]

uhmm

Never once in any of the links you or I provided was South Park cited for a source of the anger. You logically drew that conclusion yourself without anything to back it up

I was asking for Links to your claims about Viacom HQ being a target and that the man was upset because his terrorist bosses were being targeted. You still haven't provided either thus nothing but speculation and stupidity.

You seriously aren't aware that the bomb was outside the Viacom studios?

REALLY?

Try googling "viacom bomb."

That was a pretty tough one to come up with search terms for. The only debate is rather it's coincidence or intentional. Like I said, I'm sure it was purely coincidence...

Thanks, at least you admitted you didn't vet the articles you posted aside from skimming headlines. Whats funny is that most of the articles you posted contradicted your narrative. But go ahead and continue to alter your position when you get called out on bullshit by claiming your trying to argue a bigger point no one is buying that horsehit.

Are you fucking retarded? That's not what I said (nor did) in the least. If YOUR retarded ass had actually read them rather than skimming for something that resembles something you've seen in a blog, you'd realize this.

You found one fucking line that you like, which *supports* my argument while stating that it's not perfectly solved, and you somehow think you can turn that into *ME* not reading shit.

Fuck off dude, seriously.

And I'll post it again.

http://abcnews.go.com/WNT/video/time...omber-10567090

So yeah According to Plow an ABC news story with the headline Times Square Bomber: Why Did He Do It? has nothing to do with the subject. Especially if it goes against your narrative. Jfc you really believe that don't you?

Seriously?

You JUST got done accusing me of not actually reading anything but headlines... and then you prove beyond any reasonable doubt that you're posting the same link over and over BASED ON THE FUCKING HEADLINE with no idea what the actual content is?

Here's an idea: give your own fucking impression. Not your bullshit evil empire rhetoric, tell me, in your own words, how on earth that video gives any semblance of credibility to you argument.

Nice going well until you started qualifying it and pretty much gave him a pass at the end there. Thanks for proving you're a partisan hack.

Holy fuck the stupidity...

That wasn't "Giving Obama a pass" you incredible dipshit. That was giving you an example of something Clinton did wrong.

There really are no words here for how incredibly imbecilic you're being here.

If its so simple why not post the article? Is it because I caught you in a goddamn lie that you can't prove it? On top of that you try to disarm my argument by "Feel free to say that means I'm bullshitting" in a lame attempt to and shield yourself from the blowback. Sorry didn't work and so..Plow you're bullshitting.

Like I said, feel free to convince yourself in your crazy fucking mind.


Or do a little god damn research of your own.


Everyone that actually has is laughing at you right now for falling into that, btw.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/worl...#ixzz0mt8WuQn1

This is a fucking huge deal, dipshit, if you were AT ALL informed about the situation in Pakistan I would not need to tell you about the major fucking attacks that have been going on which you're literally sitting here bitching about endlessly while being clueless.

Seriously, before you try to call bullshit, know what the fuck you're talking about.

http://www.nypost.com/p/news/local/t...pAYfahVx03zskI

What's sad is that I don't even have to get into the fact that you're saying an organization which regularly kills civilians within Pakistan for believing differently than them and to attempt to scare the government into cooperation is actually more pissed off about us killing those same civilians than dismantling their leadership.

Get a fucking clue dude, seriously.

Well I did say beforehand it was an ad hominem. It was mainly for my amusement since you were calling me out that I was.. Whats the quote again?

Yeah, Even when faced with the facts in the Texas cop story and how he fucked up you kept on defending him even after said cop admitted he fucked up lol. talk about Pigheaded.

Again, I said all along that he obviously didn't handle it as well as he could have. The point was that you're bitching about someone that broke the law in a multitude of ways, including fleeing police, then finally stopped, jumped out and rushed the cop car with 3 people, was then detained.

It's a perfect example of how far up your ass you keep your head when you can literally defend targeting innocent civilians specifically for murder then turn around and attack someone for defending an extremely stressed cop for making a mistake which had the utterly terrifying result of making someone that broke the fuck out of the law and followed a laundry list of what not to do when getting arrested have a hard time.


The reality is that you look at a fucking video of a guy doing every damn thing you're taught not to do to police officers and getting the exact (actually, much better) treatment than you'd expect, then claim based on hindsight that the cop's actions are absolutely indefensible, when they're absolutely not.

I know how you 'win' internet arguments Plow I'm not stupid. You essentially go back and forth altering your position to gain ground and pretty much bore the other poster(s) into essentially giving up(hi2u religion debates with Neo). Its not happening here with me though.

First off, yes, you are really fucking stupid. If there's one thing that's been proved beyond any doubt in this thread, it's that you can't comprehend what you read and you throw out ridiculous quantities of just plain idiotic bullshit to cover it.


Secondly, go ahead and insult me for being able to see more than 1 side of an issue all you like. It's quite literally people like you that are ruining America, regardless of if they're on the same side as you.

So lets continue annoying everyone else by our constant back and forth until a Mod decides to spare the forums shall we?

Fish for your own bans, I'll keep shoving the facts down your throat while you resort to trying to insult me about year old threads and arguments with neo where I was right then, too.


ps: In before "omg prove the Taliban kills innocent civilians!"


edit:

Spoiler: show

lol now you got me looking at that thread... I completely forgot about the part where the dude that was so terribly unjustly detained against his will that a cop got fired over it... stood there arguing with the cops for a minute after he was allowed to go. Man, the fail, incredible.

[Rhinox]

AHAHAHAHAHAHAHA


ok Your first Article

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/worl...#ixzz0mt8WuQn1

Two new videos from the Pakistani Taliban appear to show their leader alive and refuting earlier American and Pakistani claims that he was killed in a U.S. missile strike. The videos featuring Hakimullah Mehsud surfaced over the weekend after an attempted car bombing in New York City, and were the strongest evidence yet that he had survived the January missile attack. They underscore the patchy nature of intelligence gathering from the remote, isolated Pakistani tribal regions where Taliban, Al Qaeda and other militant groups have congregated.

In the clips, both apparently dated in April, Mehsud promises attacks on major U.S. cities, but officials have played down any Taliban links to the scare in Times Square. One of the videos, broadcast on Pakistani television, shows Mehsud sitting in between two masked, armed men. In the background is a banner featuring crossed swords and an Arabic verse.
Speaking in Pashto, but with English subtitles, Mehsud assures viewers he was not killed in a missile strike or any other way, referring to specific reports of his death as lies and propaganda.

"(Praised be to God), on the 4th day of April 2010, I give good news to the Muslim (world) about being alive and healthy," Mehsud says in the nearly nine-minute clip. The second clip is two minutes, 19 seconds long, and has a still picture of Mehsud next to a map of the U.S. showing explosions in three cities coast to coast, according to IntelCenter, a U.S.-based militant media monitor. The map is not detailed enough to identify which cities.
A voice that sounds like Mehsud's says the tape was recorded on April 19. Speaking Urdu, he says the group's main targets from now on are U.S. cities, and that "good news will be heard within some days or weeks.'

U.S. and Pakistani officials had been confident until recently that a January missile strike had killed Mehsud somewhere along the border dividing South Waziristan and North Waziristan tribal regions. The Taliban, however, had consistently denied that Mehsud was killed, but they refused to provide evidence that he was alive on grounds it would endanger his security.
Last week, four Pakistani intelligence officials said the spy networks had determined that Mehsud was alive after all after getting new information from electronic surveillance and reports from sources in the field, including from inside the Taliban.

One of them said Mehsud was believed to have been wounded in the attack but had largely recovered. Another intelligence officials also said Mehsud was no longer the major force in the Taliban movement, which has carried out scores of attacks in Pakistan in recent years and is allied with Al Qaeda and militants in Afghanistan fighting U.S. and Nato troops. And in Washington last week, Pentagon Press Secretary Geoff Morrell said he had seen 'no evidence' that Mehsud 'is operational today or is executing or exerting authority over the Pakistan Taliban as he once did'. Neither official explained Mehsud's alleged loss of clout, but the militant network has been pummeled over the last six months by relentless U.S. missile attacks and Pakistan army offensives that have pushed it from once-secure bases along the border.

The officials all spoke on condition of anonymity because the spy agencies do not allow their operatives to be named in the media.

btw nothing in this article besides the author links the two things.

Next we have this shinning turd from Rupert Murdoch own New York post might as well have been a Fox news alert.

It was payback.
The Connecticut man charged yesterday with the botched Times Square car bombing confessed to trying to slaughter innocent people in retaliation for US drone attacks that wiped out the leadership of his beloved Taliban, The Post has learned. Admitted terrorist Faisal Shahzad -- who copped to training in explosives in the past year with Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan, the leading extremist Islamic group in his native Pakistan -- said he was driven to evil by the slew of deaths among leaders of the terror group, law-enforcement sources revealed yesterday.

His training came in a tribal area where American drone aircraft have pummeled members of the Pakistan Taliban and al Qaeda in the past year.

Sources said he was an eyewitness to the onslaught throughout the eight months he spent in Pakistan beginning last summer.
[B]The Pakistani Taliban claimed responsibility for the Times Square bombing attempt immediately after it occurred, saying it was in response to the drone killing of one of its leaders in August -- but that claim had been roundly discounted by US authorities at the time.
But by yesterday, Pakistani Foreign Minister Makhdoom Qureshi said, "This is a blowback. This is a reaction. This is retaliation. And you could expect that," according to CBS News. "Let's not be naive. They're going to fight back." Shahzad's motive came to light as he admitted leaving a smoldering makeshift bomb containing propane tanks, gasoline canisters, fertilizer and fireworks in a Nissan Pathfinder at West 45th Street and Broadway Saturday evening.
The married father of two young children was slapped with a slew of charges, including acts of terrorism, attempting to use a weapon of mass destruction and transporting and using explosives.
In other developments:
* When lawmen pulled Shahzad off an Emirates Airlines flight about to take off from JFK for Dubai, he told them, "I was expecting you. Are you NYPD or FBI?" Newsweek quoted him asking.
* The 30-year-old suspect earlier had managed to slip FBI surveillance. Agents supposed to be tailing him in Bridgeport, Conn., Monday saw him leave a grocery store near his home at 3 p.m. and followed him but later lost him. The plan had been to arrest him at his apartment Monday evening.

Okay so Fox news lite decides to use a quote with no context so it can fit its narrative of it being in response to a drone strike on taliban leaders that happened months ago.

Whats funny is that it totally contradicts every other news outlet.

including dundundun


http://abcnews.go.com/WNT/video/time...omber-10567090

[Plow]

AHAHAHAHAHAHAHA


ok Your first Article

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/worl...#ixzz0mt8WuQn1




btw nothing in this article besides the author links the two things.

le sigh...

The point of that link was to point out that the specific attacks he's referring to are not some shit that just came up when this happened. People that are informed about the situation have been aware of this for a long time, it's a big fucking deal.

Hence the sentence right afterward where I explained that... it's a big fucking deal and people that are informed about the situation are already well aware.

Next we have this shinning turd from Rupert Murdoch own New York post might as well have been a Fox news alert.



Okay so Fox news lite decides to use a quote with no context so it can fit its narrative of it being in response to a drone strike on taliban leaders that happened months ago.

Whats funny is that it totally contradicts every other news outlet.

including dundundun


http://abcnews.go.com/WNT/video/time...omber-10567090

Now you're just plain lying.

That video does not contradict what I'm saying at all.


Seriously, watch your own damn video link. You've posted it like 4 times now, without even the tiniest bit of analysis beyond WATCH UR RONGZ!

[bluefan]

A bit off topic, but we up here in the great north go something similar too.

http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNew...b=TopStoriesV2

Makes me wonder if I should drive to Seattle for PAX now.

[Rhinox]

You win plow. I honestly don't have the energy to answer you anymore because in all honesty I get more give and take from my bedroom wall. I thought I could do it but I can't.

You've outlasted me congratulations.

But If i was to respond to you last post it would go something like this

Spoiler: show

Neither of those two articles prove anything. One of the articles talks about a Taliban leader swearing revenge and the other is essentially Fox news claiming it was for killing his bosses which no other news outlet picked up.

btw Abc news refutes your claim. http://abcnews.go.com/WNT/video/time...omber-10567090

[Bingbong]

NECROBUMP!!!

Shahzad plead guilty to all counts, went on some diatribe about blowing up Americans, saved the US money pleading guilty.

http://news.blogs.cnn.com/2010/06/21...quare-charges/

[Correction]

Yay we caught a horribly incompetent terrorist. USA! USA!

[Kuya]

Don't get too excited, correction. There's a billion guys just like shahzad out there, so i think we need more war planes.

[*Shinzon*]

Don't get too excited, correction. There's a billion guys just like shahzad out there, so i think we need more war planes.

Don't you mean more predator drones?

[Kuya]

More bases too.

[Meat]

did they torture him for valuable information?

[Rhinox]