http://www.escapistmagazine.com/arti...-Comprehension
An excerpt
Originally Posted by The Escapist
Have you ever read a newspaper article or Time magazine piece from the 1940s and thought to yourself, "Wow, this article is so intelligently written. The writing in modern mags and papers seems dumbed down in comparison." If so, you'd be right.
In the 1950s, two researchers, Rudolph Flesch and Robert Gunning, began working with newspapers and wire services to improve what they termed "readability." Readability is the degree to which words can be understood by readers. It is today measured by scores named after their inventors, the Flesch Reading Ease Score (1-100) and the Gunning-Fog Index (1-14+). The latter is the well-known "grade level" score of reading, as in "Reader's Digest is written at the 9th grade level."
At the time they did their research, most newspapers were written at the 12th grade level. Flesch and Gunning saw this as a bad thing; they believed that work should be written at a reading level that matches the reading comprehension score of the average American adult, which is around 8th-9th grade level. More importantly, they uncovered evidence that the lower the grade level of the writing (or the higher the readability, as they would euphemistically put it), the wider the circulation. Flesch and Gunning found that high-class magazines at the 12th grade level had circulation of less than 1 million, while pulp rags written at the 6th grade level circulated at more than 10 million.
The reason for the correlation is that consumers with low reading comprehension simply cannot enjoy work written at a higher grade level, regardless of its quality. Edward Gibbon's Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire has a Gunning-Fog Index of 19.2, suggesting that while it may be the most masterful work of historical analysis ever written, most college graduates (16th grade) can't even comprehend it. It will never be an Amazon best-seller, because there aren't enough people able to appreciate it.I debated putting this in gaming so BRP could bitch about sophistry in games criticism, but it's also a good segueway out of the idiocracy references in that Obama thread.Originally Posted by The Escapist
But the notion of "grade level" or content comprehensibility is quite extensible beyond reading. For instance, in music, there is the concept of audiation, or music appreciation, the process of mentally hearing and comprehending music. According to music education research E.E. Gordon, "when you are listening to music, you are giving meaning to what you just heard by recalling what you have heard on earlier occasions [and] anticipating or predicting what you are hearing next, based on your musical achievement." This is the same skill set that a reader employs when parsing text. And music, like text, can come at different grade levels, which can be comprehended ("appreciated") by listeners of different skill. That's why the average music listener likes pop music with easily accessible hooks, while music snobs enjoy Bach or atonal experimental rock, but find pop music the equivalent of children's books.
Comprehension level can also be applied to narrative, as is the case for film studies, and to games - though that is only just now becoming understood. Whether we're talking about "reading comprehension," "music appreciation," or "film studies," the underlying concept is the same, and it explains why we even have literature snobs, film snobs, music snobs, and game snobs at all. To be a snob is to be a consumer only willing to consume content created at a high comprehension level.
XI Wiki


