idk i kinda got the impression tmnt IS a kids movie.
idk i kinda got the impression tmnt IS a kids movie.
I rewatched the first two movies this last week (no force on Earth short of a gun to my head would make me rematch 3). The original has held up, but the second is honestly pretty bad. Most quality nostalgia people are having for Turtles is from the cartoon, which is still fantastic.
My 5 year old wants to see this & gaurdians badly, but I keep telling him he's not old enough. Of course, the new turtle figures that are out in stores are for 4+, so he's asking why he can play with the toys, but not watch the movie.
Part of me wants to bring him, knowing we can leave if need be, but I'm just concerned about the language and violence.
I know my sister took my six year old nephew and they seemed to enjoy it.
i don't remember any swearing, but i wasn't really watching for it. the violence is pretty glossed over, too. i think there's only one scene where any injuries are shown, and it's shown only as a red spot on a white shirt. the bad guys just do the usual "get hit once and disappear" thing. i think transformers had way more language/violence.
i think you'd be okay bringing him. even if there is stuff i don't remember, it's not really worse than anything he'll see watching power rangers or something. the more i think about it the more convinced I am that this is a kids movie. that's not always a bad thing; lots of kids movies have enough in there for parents to be appealing to everyone, but i don't think TMNT did a very good job of that.
tmnt (1990) at least had a coherent theme regarding son/father & student/master. also ernie reyes jr.
I thought Ernie was secret of the ooze
well he was behind the scenes in 1, stunt dude. his essence was there god damnit just let my joke ride.
What, the shittiest of the first three cinematic films that grossed the least in the box office? I don't think that anyone here is going to say it isn't crap, but in that film's case, consumers actually did vote with a lack of support. I wouldn't say it was guilty of ruining the TMNT—the then-movie franchise, absolutely, but considering that this entry was about universally reviled, that was fine. Also, any subsequent DVD sales are forever tainted by the fact that this was often a pack-in, because whenever else would anyone ever buy this turd?
So, you're absolutely right—money talks, and in the case of that film, it absolutely did. That is a case of desired results.
Also, the first film is still a fine indie flick, and I'll defend Jim Henson's Creature Shop until the end of my days.
Semi revalent but Michael bay might not direct transformer 5
Good news!
Yeah, I seem to recall him saying the same thing after 3. I imagine Paramount (right?) will roll a giant truck of money up to his door to get him on for 5.
Clearly standards have been lowered since the third movie and people are okay with terrible films. There's clearly only one solution.
Spoiler: show
I suppose we'd first have to agree on what the baseline is before we evaluate the adaptations. The cartoons and the films were made to sell toys, nothing else. The germ of the very franchise was a pastiche of the grimdark comics world of the early 80s. Everything is a teenager and it's gritty and dark(New Mutants). Everything is a ninja and it's gritty and dark (Ronin). Everything is an animal and its gritty and dark (Cerberus). The concept fell victim to an audience that didn't get the joke and a merch empire was born. TMNT has never been unpopular, just like Transformers. Nothing can 'kill' it. Even the worst films of the franchise made money, even if TMNT '07 cut it close on the international ticket sales. Wanting a good writer, good production designer and good director to put together a TMNT film is wishing it to be something it never really was. To do so in the name of nostalgia makes even less sense.
The cartoon was originally created to fuel toy sales but it also lasted for 10 seasons and almost 200 episodes. That's far more then just an excuse to sell some toys.