C - Josh Gibson - Already mentioned him, to me this is an easy choice.
1B - Lou Gehrig - Was going to put Pujols here and assume he doesn't fall off a cliff tomorrow, but I just can't do it. Pujols hasn't quite reached the kind of peak seasons as Gehrig - of course sadly in this era, that seems to be one of the points for him being legit.
2B - Eddie Collins - I'm glad he's been mentioned more than once here. His numbers are better than they look (if comparing to Hornsby), because of the era. Consider a snapshot of the average runs per game for 1909 AL (3.44), and for Hornsby in 1929 NL (5.36). I think you can see what I'm getting at. Collins was also a better defensive 2B if still comparing to Hornsby.
SS - Honus Wagner - Gave others some thought, but Wagner was too dominant during his era.
3B - Mike Schmidt - His AVG And OBP leave something to be desired, but his power and defense are just enough in what is probably a weaker position.
LF - Ted Williams - Nice to have an easy choice.
CF - Mickey Mantle - This position is absurd. You can go so many different ways here.. Mays, Cobb, Oscar Charleston, Tris Speaker, DiMaggio, Griffey.. Since there are so many, and it's arguably a "pick 'em", I chose who I thought was the most physically gifted, with the highest potential.
RF - Babe Ruth - No-brainer.
LHP - Lefty Grove - A 3.06 ERA and 300 wins are strong numbers, but just looking at that doesn't come close to doing him justice. He led the league in ERA nine times... To 300 wins are just 141 losses, a ridiculous .680 winning percentage (best among those with 300+ wins). It's sort of like Pedro Martinez, if Pedro had added 1,000+ innings to his dominance (and been a little better in the postseason, I suppose). The only thing against him in comparison to a Walter Johnson is sheer IP. He only played in a few WS, but he was brilliant when he did.
RHP - Walter Johnson - Not as impressive inning per inning as Grove, but still remarkable, and the IP advantage does mean something.
CL - Mariano Rivera - A relief after going through SP.
I had every intention of choosing 5 SP, but I eventually gave up in frustration. There are just too many for five spots.. The only 2 I felt good about happened to be a righty and a lefty, so I just went with that. Just look at this shit with only 3 spots open:
Pete Alexander, Cy Young, Christy Mathewson, Tom Seaver, Kid Nichols, Warren Spahn, Bob Gibson, Randy Johnson, Greg Maddux, Pedro Martinez, etc.. Satchel Paige from the Negro leagues.. Even Sandy Koufax, if you decided to really stress peak stretches over the typical 10-20 year spans. It just goes on, and on.. So screw it, I'll take whichever 3 of these to pair with the 2 I've chosen.
There is an argument that says the level of competition has improved enough that these "old" players aren't a valid choice, but I can't completely buy it. I agree the population has risen, I agree that you have the entirety of the population represented now, instead of only part.. But it can't be logical to disqualify people entirely based on when they played - is everyone who has played up until now going to be disqualified from discussions in 50 or 100 years? I hope not. Not to mention, for the old players I'm really referencing, there is a counter point: with about half as many teams in a league, that evens out some of the talent/population differences.
XI Wiki



