Yeah. America kinda came into the fight when the Allies were already winning and if you disagree there's always the fact that Russia alone was capable of taking out Germany.
Yeah. America kinda came into the fight when the Allies were already winning and if you disagree there's always the fact that Russia alone was capable of taking out Germany.
telling that to plow?
http://media.comicvine.com/uploads/2..._you_super.jpg
Funny story, I actually went back in time to pick a fight with Hitler, for some reason he thought my name was Max Steinberg, weird.
He must have assburgers too.
My nation could beat up your nation.
What I mean to say is, I agree. One day, the people in charge of countries may actually realize, like the people who war actually effects, that war is simply not worth fighting. Unfortunately, that day is a far day off for countries with little to start with or Dick Cheney.
classic case of do as I say, not as I do, eh?
If the Germans didn't have to fight full forces on 2 fronts, and Russia had to take out Japan therefore putting them on 2 fronts, yes, it would have taken a hell of a lot longer and a whole hell of a lot more deaths, if they were able to pull it off.
Not to mention Russia had already suffered a tremendous amount of deaths. America didn't win the war, Germany lost it by being fucking retarded. Japan too.
Even if Pearl Harbor hadn't happened, we would have been dragged into the war eventually, considering that if Hitler had succeeded in dominating Europe and beating Russia, he was going to bring the war to our footsteps.
Anyway, happy 4th.
I probably wouldn't fight until the USA and the people I love were in danger. It's unfortunate, but to this day there are people like Hitler all over the world doing the same type of things he did. It really all comes down to what ideals and which people you're willing to risk your neck for.
Dozens of millions? are you fucking stupid?
No just no. Pick up a goddamn history book
The Japanese had their hands full with Mainland China to even consider invading Russia. Never mind the fact that they were even worst equip at fighting Russia during Russian winters then the Germans were.
Do you not understand how Germany was beaten back by the Russians even though their military was more sophisticated?
~75 million people died in WWII. If it dragged on for twice as long, dozens of millions is an extremely reasonable estimation.
Yes, I do. Unfortunately, you obviously don't-- they were only able to push them back because the Japanese had turned their attention towards the U.S.The Japanese had their hands full with Mainland China to even consider invading Russia. Never mind the fact that they were even worst equip at fighting Russia during Russian winters then the Germans were.
Do you not understand how Germany was beaten back by the Russians even though their military was more sophisticated?
If they weren't able to pull in the reserves from the southeast, they would have been unable to do anything but try to hold out on the eastern front.
I know you're convinced that since some wars are wrong, all wars are always wrong no matter what, but this really isn't an argument you want to have. You don't have a fucking clue what you're talking about, all you have is the talking points you heard someone say and took as gospel since it was on one of your favorite hyper-liberal blogs.
Again you don't know what the fuck and btw I'm not the one pulling an arbitrary number out of my ass and claiming it as fact.
You said 10-15 years and dozens of millions of people. Where did you get that number?
You also said 75 million people died during WW2 that estimated number includes civilian deaths. So what you're telling me is that the war would have lasted almost three times as long yet have 1/3 of the casualties.
This is what happens when you post stupid numbers you get called out on it.
As Daniel Patrick Moynihan said you're entitled to your own opinion but you're not entitled to your own facts.
and with that I'm done arguing with you. I'm not getting drawn into a three page debate with a retard.
10-15 years is a reasonable estimate for what it would have taken Russia to regenerate a fucking entire generation of troops.
You realize they literally lost about 15% of their entire population, right?
What? I said 2 dozen exactly? Oh, wait, that's right, you're making shit up.You also said 75 million people died during WW2 that estimated number includes civilian deaths. So what you're telling me is that the war would have lasted almost three times as long yet have 1/3 of the casualties.
I said dozens because hundreds would be a very liberal estimate given the amount of people that were already dead. There quite simply wouldn't have been the fighting forces to continue throwing millions of lives at them, the numbers would have been lower per amount of time.
Liar.This is what happens when you post stupid numbers you get called out on it.
As Daniel Patrick Moynihan said you're entitled to your own opinion but you're not entitled to your own facts.
and with that I'm done arguing with you.
And what's saddest is I'm giving you a HUGE fucking break on your outright claim that Russia would have won regardless.