Item Search
     
BG-Wiki Search
Page 60 of 150 FirstFirst ... 10 50 58 59 60 61 62 70 110 ... LastLast
Results 1181 to 1200 of 2987
  1. #1181
    Can you spare some gil?
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    8,771
    BG Level
    8

    Anyone done any testing with restraint to show if its worth using on WAR for WS, with the cost of no crits?

  2. #1182
    rog
    rog is offline
    Banned.

    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    3,874
    BG Level
    7

    Quote Originally Posted by Cymmina View Post
    I saw a guy doing that in Grauberg [S] while I was doing staff trials on treants. Not only was he below ground, he was teleporting around above ground, too. I could see him every once in a while for a split second. Scanning for Dark Ixion makes sense I guess... but as fast as he was zipping around the area, how does SE not flag that shit?
    Probably because they're too lazy to code something that wouldn't catch normal occurrences, such as if people start to dc, but don't fully dc, which looks just like pos hacking.

    Getting away with pos/speed hacking is about as easy as casting invisible.

  3. #1183
    rog
    rog is offline
    Banned.

    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    3,874
    BG Level
    7

    Quote Originally Posted by Shenrien View Post
    Anyone done any testing with restraint to show if its worth using on WAR for WS, with the cost of no crits?
    When i first got it, i used a few times, and my RRs dropped a good 2-300 damage. Could have just been a coincidence, but seems like garbage to me.

  4. #1184
    Old Merits
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    1,027
    BG Level
    6

    What about Restraint used on a weaponskill that, you know, doesn't crit?

  5. #1185
    BG Content
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    22,335
    BG Level
    10
    FFXI Server
    Lakshmi
    Blog Entries
    1

    Quote Originally Posted by rog View Post
    When i first got it, i used a few times, and my RRs dropped a good 2-300 damage. Could have just been a coincidence, but seems like garbage to me.
    I've also never noticed a positive change when using it. I tried to test it on level 0 mobs, no noticeable effect. I tried to test it in a merit party with Fort Axe and KJ... no noticeable effect. The description is:

    "Enhances your weapon skill power with each normal attack you land, but prevents you from dealing Critical Hits"

    A friend suggested that it might require your "each normal attack that land" be on the same mob as what you're WS, which would make it essentially worthless for merit mobs. If it works, I don't know how it works. Currently it's a tool that Bravuras can use so they don't triple damage crit monsters to death, if they feel it's worth it.

  6. #1186
    Bagel
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    1,324
    BG Level
    6
    FFXIV Character
    Carraway Author
    FFXIV Server
    Excalibur
    FFXI Server
    Odin

    Restraint is absolute shit for RR due to obvious reasons: no crits. It might be worth it for SC if you're looking to completely frontload damage for closing a skillchain or something, but overall, the sacrifice in DoT far outweighs any potential gains (personal experience has shown, at most, a positive variance of 50-100 damage on a 300% TP SC after charging Restraint from 0-300%, but I didn't test it much, and that extra damage could have had absolutely nothing to do with Restraint).

  7. #1187
    Old Merits
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    1,033
    BG Level
    6
    FFXI Server
    Phoenix

    Quote Originally Posted by rog View Post
    Why are you assuming someone would use a mule for nothing but scanning di/sw?

    Plenty of people have mule accounts for bazaaring, pling, gardening, etc that can be used for it.
    cause if it could be banned at any time from that (i mean, it does look pretty obvious) they'd lose all their bazaar'd junk/high level mage char/precious pots?

  8. #1188
    BG Content
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    22,335
    BG Level
    10
    FFXI Server
    Lakshmi
    Blog Entries
    1

    Sooooo.... Saber Dance looks like it's main-hand only to me. Furthermore, it looks much less potent than wiki claims. I'd really like to know the source for the 50->10% decay stat.

    At the moment, looks main-hand-only 50% DA rate that suppresses natural Double Attack (gear, subjob) so you can't 4-hit attack round without an OAT offhand. I'd have noticed this sooner, but I was offhanding Athame, Parazonium, or Joyeuse.

  9. #1189
    Banned.

    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    5,674
    BG Level
    8

    Quote Originally Posted by Byrthnoth View Post
    Sooooo.... Saber Dance looks like it's main-hand only to me. Furthermore, it looks much less potent than wiki claims. I'd really like to know the source for the 50->10% decay stat.

    At the moment, looks main-hand-only 50% DA rate that suppresses natural Double Attack (gear, subjob) so you can't 4-hit attack round without an OAT offhand. I'd have noticed this sooner, but I was offhanding Athame, Parazonium, or Joyeuse.
    How extensive was your testing? That pretty much kills the DNC zerg idea if accurate.

  10. #1190
    Nidhogg
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    3,933
    BG Level
    7
    FFXIV Character
    Serefina Solfyre
    FFXIV Server
    Odin
    FFXI Server
    Bahamut

    Quote Originally Posted by CDF View Post
    I recently had the pleasure of having Bind on Zipacna persist after several nukes (on BLM80), so killing it was fast. Is this normal?
    I'm 99.9% sure the chance of it happening is to do with the level difference between the mob and you. Anyone killing Groundskeepers even at 75 could tell you that you can often land 1+ nukes without Bind breaking, but I can't remember a single time I nuked Zipacna/Faust etc at 75RDM without Bind breaking.

    Going back at 80RDM, Faust's Bind wasn't breaking after the first nuke a lot of the time, etc.

  11. #1191
    BG Content
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    22,335
    BG Level
    10
    FFXI Server
    Lakshmi
    Blog Entries
    1

    Quote Originally Posted by Thorny View Post
    How extensive was your testing? That pretty much kills the DNC zerg idea if accurate.
    So far, not that much really. I killed maybe 10 mobs and with Fusetto/Dakini and basically spent the whole time going, "WTF, where are my four-hit attack rounds?" Only counted the last 3 mobs (canceled after 1 minute) and I'm on lolPS2 so it has to be done by hand.


    I should note, I was on DNC/WAR so I'd have expected to see a 4-hit round or two even without Saber Dance up. I'm going to do further testing on DNC/NIN without Suppa or Brutal (no DA and I'll get 5TP/hit to make it easy to count rounds).

  12. #1192
    rog
    rog is offline
    Banned.

    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    3,874
    BG Level
    7

    Quote Originally Posted by Raen Ryong View Post
    I'm 99.9% sure the chance of it happening is to do with the level difference between the mob and you. Anyone killing Groundskeepers even at 75 could tell you that you can often land 1+ nukes without Bind breaking, but I can't remember a single time I nuked Zipacna/Faust etc at 75RDM without Bind breaking.

    Going back at 80RDM, Faust's Bind wasn't breaking after the first nuke a lot of the time, etc.
    I'm not so sure though. If you bind some really low level mobs, and try, you'll still break bind a lot. But then there's things like buffaloes (at least in NW, not sure about others), which almost never break bind with a single nuke, and it's not uncommon to get as many as 5 or more nukes off just to have it wear off on it's own. It doesn't seem consistent between levels, or even int values. Honestly my only guess would be that maybe certain mobs are just less likely to have a bind broken with a nuke, regardless of their level/int. Or maybe it's a combination of that, as well as int and/or level.

    Maybe we should try testing it on one mob family of extremely different levels, as well as with burn+absorb int (in case it's based entirely on mob's int, and not on the caster's), as well as stacked int.

  13. #1193
    CDF
    CDF is offline
    Sea Torques
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    599
    BG Level
    5

    Quote Originally Posted by Raen Ryong View Post
    I'm 99.9% sure the chance of it happening is to do with the level difference between the mob and you. Anyone killing Groundskeepers even at 75 could tell you that you can often land 1+ nukes without Bind breaking, but I can't remember a single time I nuked Zipacna/Faust etc at 75RDM without Bind breaking.

    Going back at 80RDM, Faust's Bind wasn't breaking after the first nuke a lot of the time, etc.
    Despot would be an case to determine whether decreased level difference could be that dominant a factor. At least at level 75, Bind lasting through one nuke is very rare (if it's even possible as I have yet to observe it), but I haven't had occasion to kill it recently.

  14. #1194
    Hydra
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    108
    BG Level
    3
    FFXI Server
    Cerberus

    Quote Originally Posted by Byrthnoth View Post
    Sooooo.... Saber Dance looks like it's main-hand only to me. Furthermore, it looks much less potent than wiki claims. I'd really like to know the source for the 50->10% decay stat.

    At the moment, looks main-hand-only 50% DA rate that suppresses natural Double Attack (gear, subjob) so you can't 4-hit attack round without an OAT offhand. I'd have noticed this sooner, but I was offhanding Athame, Parazonium, or Joyeuse.
    Well I just grabbed a Mercenary Captain's kukri to check this out.
    DNC/NIN - Auric/M.C Kukri, no DA gear, no haste gear, no haste samba, no suppa, no food.
    I saw both main hand DAs and off hand DAs aswell as one 4-hit DA damage in log looked like this 86(Auric)>89(Auric)>25(MCK)>39(MCK)>59(Auric)

  15. #1195
    CoP Dynamis
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    293
    BG Level
    4
    FFXIV Character
    Seraph Altima
    FFXIV Server
    Mateus
    FFXI Server
    Cerberus
    WoW Realm
    Hyjal

    Quote Originally Posted by Tambor View Post
    Well I just grabbed a Mercenary Captain's kukri to check this out.
    DNC/NIN - Auric/M.C Kukri, no DA gear, no haste gear, no haste samba, no suppa, no food.
    I saw both main hand DAs and off hand DAs aswell as one 4-hit DA damage in log looked like this 86(Auric)>89(Auric)>25(MCK)>39(MCK)>59(Auric)
    I've also seen plenty of 4-hit attack rounds while /SAM out doing Magian trials. And yes, many were before I got my Athame to OA2 status. It's fun; looks like Hundred Daggers. Granted, I was using Brutal, and you could chalk it up to that... but I don't think I'm willing to credit the earring with every single one.

    Byrth, I'll help you test this if you tell me exactly how you're doing it. I've got plenty of non-OAT daggers still laying around to play with, and I'm a fan of both /WAR and /SAM. More sample sizes can only be a good thing, yeah?

  16. #1196
    BG Content
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    22,335
    BG Level
    10
    FFXI Server
    Lakshmi
    Blog Entries
    1

    Quote Originally Posted by Kalisa View Post
    I've also seen plenty of 4-hit attack rounds while /SAM out doing Magian trials. And yes, many were before I got my Athame to OA2 status. It's fun; looks like Hundred Daggers. Granted, I was using Brutal, and you could chalk it up to that... but I don't think I'm willing to credit the earring with every single one.

    Byrth, I'll help you test this if you tell me exactly how you're doing it. I've got plenty of non-OAT daggers still laying around to play with, and I'm a fan of both /WAR and /SAM. More sample sizes can only be a good thing, yeah?
    So far my basic testing methodology has been to grab two non-OAT daggers and hit things with Saber Dance up. I cancel Saber Dancer after a minute or whenever I need Curing Waltz IV, depending what I'm fighting.

    A confirmation that you can get a 4-hit attack round with 2 non-OAT weapons, no brutal, and /SAM would be awesome. I can't parse and I hit fast, so my notes are only as good as my eyes.

  17. #1197
    Hydra
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    108
    BG Level
    3
    FFXI Server
    Cerberus

    Dunno how good this is but > i276.photobucket.com/albums/kk4/Tambor-Caduceus/ffxi_20100731_162733.png

    That is the SS I took of my 4hit round using Auric mainhand/Merc Capt Kukri off hand with /NIN and no Brutal

    Edit: should probably have grabbed an even lower level dagger so the damage difference would be more noticable

  18. #1198
    Sea Torques
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    514
    BG Level
    5

    Any decent spots found yet for Parry/Guard past 75? I'm thinking Deco Weapons, but wondering if I'm missing something better

  19. #1199
    BG Content
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    22,335
    BG Level
    10
    FFXI Server
    Lakshmi
    Blog Entries
    1

    Quote Originally Posted by Tambor View Post
    Dunno how good this is but > i276.photobucket.com/albums/kk4/Tambor-Caduceus/ffxi_20100731_162733.png

    That is the SS I took of my 4hit round using Auric mainhand/Merc Capt Kukri off hand with /NIN and no Brutal

    Edit: should probably have grabbed an even lower level dagger so the damage difference would be more noticable
    Hmm.... your photobucket name actually gave an idea, I'll offhand my Caduceus. Are you sure that you had no DA in that picture? No Aurore Doublet?

  20. #1200
    New Spam Forum
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    171
    BG Level
    3
    FFXI Server
    Unicorn

    Is Adler Ring (Acc+8, Attack-12) ok to use in any sort of TP phase...? I'm thinking of using it on COR with Joyeuse, since I'm assuming the majority of my damage is coming from Slug/Det.

Page 60 of 150 FirstFirst ... 10 50 58 59 60 61 62 70 110 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Randomer Question Thread
    By aurik in forum FFXI: Everything
    Replies: 8518
    Last Post: 2009-07-06, 14:22
  2. Random Question Thread
    By Rocl in forum FFXI: Everything
    Replies: 2934
    Last Post: 2008-01-17, 13:43
  3. [WoTG] Random question thread
    By Koyangi in forum FFXI: Everything
    Replies: 165
    Last Post: 2008-01-02, 21:30