I think Sath and I just gave an impromptu lesson in double-teaming a giraffe... or was that the other thread?
ause:
I think it's wonderful to teach about all the different kinds of people there are in the world, and I think that the video was very nice (except for disgruntled anchorlady). I mean, I didnt know what a BJ for the longest time, always wondering why a guy would like air blown into his penis (WOULDNT HE POP?) Yeah. And anal sex. I have a female friend, and basically our conversation got to the first time I stuck a finger in my butt. I was afraid that I was going to poke a hole in myself, and either bleed to death or have to go to the emergency room and EVERYONE WOULD KNOW WHAT I DID. Sex ed for anal sex would have been great. I was always mad that they never talked about it in school (WHY WASNT I INCLUDED SCHOOL CURRICULUM, WHY?) I'm all for teaching kids that there's gayfers and you wont die if you stick a finger in your butt.
As a kid? You don't have the level of control you're speaking about. That kind of stuff comes down to your parents and sadly if they fail you get stuck inheriting the fail from them.
As an adult I agree.
Within 20 years Im sure they'll have a special on MTV where teens fuck in front of a live-studio audience the way things are going.
Seeing how he never once said anything about that particular example being true of you specifically, you're right, the irony is pretty epic here.
Hint: you failed horribly at reading comprehension and tried to defend yourself from accusations that didn't occur while entirely missing the point.
He made a sweeping generalization about someone he knows nothing about on the internet regarding family history and broad assumptions about people who have never even been brought into a conversation on these boards (to my knowledge).
Generalization can be inferred due to a complete and total lack of reasonable specificity in all aspects of the statement.
Meaning I can reasonably comment on the retardedness of the statement with personal anecdotes rebutting what was, clearly to anyone with any level of reading comprehension whatsoever, an utterly horrible use of a "royal 'you'".
So, lol, again. A-game shinin' through.
You're still missing the point entirely.
He said "Your parents made many more mistakes than that," in response to MAX.
So not only did it have nothing to do with you, it wasn't specifically that they had made that mistake.
The entire point was that saying because someone has made a mistake they can't teach others not to make the same mistake is fucking retarded. Hence pointing out that parents have made tons of mistakes, because nobody would be able to teach anything if ever making a mistake meant you couldn't learn/teach anything about it.
Learn to read, nobody said shit about your parents having children when they weren't prepared.
Happens to the best of us.
Because you're a self obsessed idiot that can't see anything you don't want to.
He didn't fucking say that max's parents had him when they weren't ready, learn to fucking read.He has no knowledge of Max's parents whatsoever.
It was a horrible use of a general "you" and you're a horrible person for assuming there was any specificity in that trash heap of a statement.
The fact that you apparently have the comprehension of a 2 year old doesn't give you an excuse to be flat out willfully ignorant when I just explained exactly what he was saying.
won't somebody please think of the children
Oh, sweet. Well I'm glad you're there to translate for me.
Max made a statement about having kids while you, yourself, are still a kid. Are you implying, because you seem to be, that being too young to appreciate the weight of your actions by getting pregnant at a young age is inversely related to being ready to be a responsible parent?
If you're ready to have, and take care of, a kid, you've made life choices and decisions that almost assuredly imply maturity.
Nobody can be a "kid" and be "ready to have a child". It is a direct contradiction. To be prepared to responsibly raise a child you need to be a mature person. Maturity, by definition, implies a lack of immaturity (you know, something attributed to kids).
And lol, again.
Trying so hard.
I mean seriously, why else do we view teen pregnancy as a bad thing? (Aside from the obvious other reasons, poverty, etc. Which still affects the decision to have a kid.)
If teenage mothers all ended up as fucking PTA chairs and "Parent of the year" recipients we wouldn't fucking need Sex Ed, now would we?
This is amazing.
You're right Sath, since I've done coke I can't ever tell my children why they shouldn't do coke.
Perfectly legitimate argument you're making here.
I'd definitely much rather have people who haven't done coke telling my children about a subject they haven't experienced.
D.A.R.E. was super fucking effective on everybody I knew, that's for sure.
That's an apt analogy, but I think I have a better one. Since you've done coke, you should spurn publicly funded education on the prevention of drug abuse on the basis that your drug usage qualifies you as the only teacher on the subject that your child will ever need.
Since, you know, Max's statement was directly related to the "school should stay out of Sex Ed, it should be the parents job" statements in this thread.
But hey, by all means, let's just go with yours.