
Originally Posted by
geno
Are you kidding lol? 6 pool on steppes doesn't have to do damage to be useful? If someone hard walls, and loses no workers, I'm pretty sure any gold+ player can't lose to a 6pool. A blind counter will end the game. A dual stalker build is closer (in terms of the potential for harass), but you don't get a free expansion with the pressure like Terran does. There aren't any blind counters to 2rax>expo (at least not yet), because scouting allows the build to change with no relative loss (relative meaning compared to what your opponent loses).
And I think you are misinterpreting when I say no sacrifice. Clearly every decision in the game involves a sacrifice, doing one thing means you aren't doing another. I meant in terms of relative position in the game. Economy wise, they come out at worst even and most likely ahead compared to other strategies. The only ones that net a stronger economy would be a straight up 1rax FE, but accounting for the extra costs incurred by the zerg from the pressure, the difference isn't that big. Clearly pressure wise, few other builds compete, forcing the zerg down very specific tech patterns. Finally, tech wise, considering the viability of a pure MMM army very late into the game, and the speed of the double techlab stim/shield upgrades, very little is given up.
Anyways I'm done with this. I mean no offense by this, but you always seem just a little too defensive about Terran stuff like this, despite noone making any real serious/controversial claims. And anyways, as a protoss, I don't really care enough about the TvZ matchup beyond the spectator perspective (of which my only gripe with the current state of things is the prevalence of the mostly unrelated, and incredibly uninteresting to watch SCV all-ins).