there would be so many buckets gotten
there would be so many buckets gotten
I agree with this crawford thing, he would help the bulls with thier horrible offense. No matter how much hollering and verbal flopping they do, that team is boring and cant score.
spurs won a bunch of rings with that style of hoops. SO PAINFUL TO WATCH
Iverson's 76'ers scored plenty, and they weren't a great defensive team
keep reaching though
There is a sportsnation Poll on which team is more likely to come back from 2-0 and win the series - Lakers or Celtics - and the Lakers have a commanding lead in poll results after like 120k votes. That seems kinda high considering Celtics are going Home and Lakers going on the Road, but I think it is just mostly due to the Lakers playing terrible + Kobe, and the Heat playing well. Doubt either team are going to be in the Finals and their consistent runs to this point in postseason over for a while. Unless the Lakers can pick up Howard, lol.
LOL@ the 76ers not being a good defensive team and scored plenty. They only had the defensive player of the year. And were 15th in scoring in 2001 when they went to the finals. Dumb basketball fan. Oh wait you a knicks fan?
read what i said dickhead
good |= great
and i love how this retard wants to say dikembe mutombo made the 76'ers a great defensive team but having iverson in an mvp year meant nothing for their offense
keep reaching
Yeah you are right, not great defense = 5th in the league in 2001. They also had MVP, DPOY, 6th man of the year, and COTY. You are right they had the scoring(scoring leader but 15th in the league), but they also had the rebound, steals, and blocks leaders. Sounds alot like shot chucking and rebounding and not great defense. I think i might have been wrong, this years bulls arent even close to being as good as iversons 76ers. This playoffs its the HEAT and MAVS. .
those 76'ers weren't great on either side, they were what you call balanced. good bench, good scorer, and a few good defenders
the bulls had a better TEAM defense than those 76'ers. they gave up less points per game in spite of not having the DPOY, they rebounded more without the leading rebounder, and shot less at a more efficient rate than those 76'ers.
just because they were both lead by scoring PG doesn't mean they're the same type of team you faggot
yo plain and simple the spurs have been the most boring fucking team of the last decade and a half. see also: pistons
pistons were tight though cuz they beat LA
Sir Charles was the greatest Sg in history! After all he was 6'4 so he had to be sg right?