lol, no he hasn't
first you don't know what traditional stats imply, then you use advanced stats that's well beyond the capability of your brain function
lol
and what's even more hilarious is you link the exact advanced stat that proves why you are dumb
so easy, too easy, what's wrong with you? lol
LOL SPOKE TOO SOON
LOL EVERYTHING YOU'VE SAID PROVES MY POINT I WON'T EXPLAIN WHY BUT IT DOES LOL
Point God
lol, how much are you willing to pay me to do a deed nobody has ever achieved to understand usage rate?
wait a minute, first you need a couple years' courses on simply traditional stats
Brilliant
Point God
It's irrelevant to what you were talking about: Rose averaging having scored or assisted on 90% of the possessions this "WHOLE SEASON"
Sorry, but he hasn't. Not even Wilt Chamberlain in his 100 point game did (from current estimation anyway). Kobe with his 81 didn't, and he almost did when he got 62 in 3 quarters against hte Mavs (87%)
The thing is, even if Rose has, usage rate does not prove or disprove it. What a failure you are. Next time you go out in the world of the internets to look for reinforcement to your idiocy, make sure you know what they mean first.
Changing the argument now? First it proved your point now it's not relevant
Backpedaling faster than Leroy
Point God
it proved my point that you are dumb, that's the point it proved
lol
Backpedaling my god..
Point God
Help me out why is the usage percentage not significant again never really explained that part
Point God
Do you know how it's calculated?
Don't hurry, we have all day. Go make you rounds on the internets.
So you can't explain it just as I figured. The majority of your post were about how I don't know anything about advance stats and how dumb I am because I used usage rates yet you never posted anything substantive to back anything you've said.
Point God