Item Search
     
BG-Wiki Search
Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Aspir and Aspir II     submit to reddit submit to twitter

  1. #1
    CDF
    CDF is offline
    Sea Torques
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    599
    BG Level
    5

    Aspir and Aspir II

    Is it ok if I put this here?

    - Dark magic skill 423 (including merits & equipment)
    - No other Aspir enhancements on equipment or from anything else (e.g., Dark Staff)
    - Firesday on worms in the past
    - Unresisted values only

    Aspir (n = 50)
    Min: 88
    Max: 169
    Mean: 131.98

    Aspir II (n = 50)
    Min: 130
    Max: 248
    Mean: 194.54

    Given the above conditions, previously it appeared the ranges of Aspir and Aspir II were...

    At 300 skill
    Aspir: 60-120
    Aspir II: 90-180

    At 400 skill
    Aspir: 80-160
    Aspir II: 120-240

    It seems Aspir's max increases 40 points per 100 skill (and the min seems to be 1/2 the max), so given 423 skill, one might expect an approximate range of 84-169. Aspir II's max seems to be 1.5x that for Aspir (min still appears to be 1/2 Aspir II's max), so at 423 skill one might expect an approximate range of 127-253

  2. #2
    BG Content
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    22,420
    BG Level
    10
    FFXI Server
    Lakshmi
    Blog Entries
    1

    So 100 skill probably increased Aspir's max by 40. If you regress that back to 0, you go through 0/0. It would be interesting to see if someone with 0 Dark Magic Skill can Aspir any MP. All the skill up crap we have these days would make it hard to tell for sure though

    Aspir: .2*Skill : .4*Skill
    Aspir II: .3*Skill : .6*Skill

  3. #3
    First invited, last in the zone.
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    1,448
    BG Level
    6
    FFXI Server
    Lakshmi

    Er, how can you tell that 88 isn't just a resisted 169 or whatever?

  4. #4
    An exploitable mess of a card game
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    13,197
    BG Level
    9
    FFXIV Character
    Gouka Mekkyaku
    FFXIV Server
    Gilgamesh
    FFXI Server
    Diabolos

    If I had to guess: Frequency.

  5. #5
    BG Content
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    22,420
    BG Level
    10
    FFXI Server
    Lakshmi
    Blog Entries
    1

    With N=50 spanning a range of 90, he couldn't tell based off frequency I'd think. I think he has shown it to be 50% max in the past though. It does make the lower bound somewhat arbitrary this time around though.

    I don't care. I believe it anyway~!

  6. #6
    D. Ring
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    4,738
    BG Level
    7
    FFXI Server
    Siren

    Does anyone remember like, a year or more ago, there was this small thread on pinning down magic accuracy? It seemed promising, something about using enspells on a target like crabs. But then like it never got re-bumped and I have no clue where it went. I don't think anyone has pinned down macc more have they?

  7. #7
    CDF
    CDF is offline
    Sea Torques
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    599
    BG Level
    5

    I've never explored the nature of resists for Drain and Aspir. Suppose I had n = 1000 and the distribution of Aspirs looked like a step function. Then this would be a sign that the distribution of resisted values overlaps the distribution of unresisted values since the evidence so far doesn't contradict the idea that the distribution of unresisted values of any of Aspir, Aspir II and Drain is uniform.

    A resisted value could lurk in the data but given 95% magic accuracy rate all I can say is that that resisted values are relatively infrequent and they are "obvious" enough when they are far apart from the rest of the data so that they can be ignored. It is more relying on infrequency of resists that I argue the min could be 1/2 the max.

    Also, I suspect the dependence of the max of Aspir or Aspir II on dark magic skill is piecewise linear so any apparent trends between 300-423 are difficult to extrapolate below 300. I was just mainly interested to see dark skill affects potency beyond 400 (so "small" samples are sufficient for this goal, assuming they didn't ninja-change anything since the last time the explicitly announced a change).