BG, you have my word that I shall marry this woman!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vm7MENnkV5A
BG, you have my word that I shall marry this woman!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vm7MENnkV5A
wasnt this guy on the Daily show last night?
Do you mean Hear ye?
I think I saw a UFO in that movie
No, it's Hear ye.. and Hear ya! as in, I hear ya!Originally Posted by Rocl
fuck, why do I even bother?
Beats me.Originally Posted by guartz
i saw OP name and was look ooooh a real live guartz postOriginally Posted by guartz
im disappointed
yeyayeyayeayeyayeyayeyayeyayeyayeay
Honestly, I expected it to be a video of Ann Coulter. I'm slightly disappointed.
The woman in that video is disappointing to. She gets off to a great start, and then slips into the insane leftwinger talking points and outright fabrications. This over elaboration on the part of opposition voices inexorably gives the people they're going after a chance to wiggle out of answering the question by merely addressing the technicalities of the statement. If she had said "Why does the united states have credibility in this after going against (EXTREMELY SPECIFIC UN ARTICLE HERE, NOT JUST "THE UN") in the war in iraq?" It would have been a much, much tougher question and she wouldn't have come off as an ultra-liberal nutjob (notice the first thing out of his mouth is, who are you with?). /sigh
Damnit guartz
Fabrications?Originally Posted by Alleya
*cough* http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_fo ... an_Century
*cough*
"Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event––like a new Pearl Harbor"
*cough*
No fabrications. Just defending my future wife, no offense.
Her problem is that her statement of the war being drawn up in Israel in '96 is pretty irrelevant to the rest of her question - if she'd pointed to the specific article of the U.N. treaty violated, ...
well, yeah - exactly what Alleya said. Just because you're a liberal nutjob doesn't mean you can't argue by the same rules as everyone else. Start small - start small.
First I get John Bolton rolled now I'm watching loose change? huh?
I thought she did a good job pointing out that all of this was premeditated.
But I'm not sure if you guys are convinced.
Ok, go here.
http://www.newamericancentury.org/defen ... ty2001.htm
Click on the "Preserving Pax Americana" pdf.
Pages 7-8, talks about the need for "missile defense" systems near the balkans.
And what's the tension now with Russia and USA? Anybody got an answer?
Originally Posted by guartz
Ooh, oooh, I got one. It's called the NY Times forums.
lolguartz
Did I watch the same video as you? She had no fucking clue what she was talking about. She couldn't even get the "Talking Points" spit out at a decent rate. I expected more out of you Guartz, but not surprisingly you didn't produce.Originally Posted by guartz
I don't see how Bolton got owned when he calmly dismissed her like a fucking nutjob. He rolled all over her.
I thought the same thing. I was expecting much more with the title "John Bolton gets TORCHED". Yeah he really got embarassed up there.Originally Posted by Parshias
![]()
Rofl at the comments to that video.
Well you gotta understand, that this video is somewhat old.
Pointing out to Bolton on national teevee that "you are full of shit and this war was premeditated" back when practically every news outlet was licking this administration's cornhole, IS pretty impressive.
Now pretty much very body questions the Iraq War.