Liberalism, atheism, male sexual exclusivity linked to higher IQ

[Zeb]

http://www.cnn.com/2010/HEALTH/02/26...ex.html?hpt=P1

(CNN) -- Political, religious and sexual behaviors may be reflections of intelligence, a new study finds.

Evolutionary psychologist Satoshi Kanazawa at the the London School of Economics and Political Science correlated data on these behaviors with IQ from a large national U.S. sample and found that, on average, people who identified as liberal and atheist had higher IQs. This applied also to sexual exclusivity in men, but not in women. The findings will be published in the March 2010 issue of Social Psychology Quarterly.

The IQ differences, while statistically significant, are not stunning -- on the order of 6 to 11 points -- and the data should not be used to stereotype or make assumptions about people, experts say. But they show how certain patterns of identifying with particular ideologies develop, and how some people's behaviors come to be.

The reasoning is that sexual exclusivity in men, liberalism and atheism all go against what would be expected given humans' evolutionary past. In other words, none of these traits would have benefited our early human ancestors, but higher intelligence may be associated with them.

"The adoption of some evolutionarily novel ideas makes some sense in terms of moving the species forward," said George Washington University leadership professor James Bailey, who was not involved in the study. "It also makes perfect sense that more intelligent people -- people with, sort of, more intellectual firepower -- are likely to be the ones to do that."

Bailey also said that these preferences may stem from a desire to show superiority or elitism, which also has to do with IQ. In fact, aligning oneself with "unconventional" philosophies such as liberalism or atheism may be "ways to communicate to everyone that you're pretty smart," he said.

The study looked at a large sample from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health (Add Health), which began with adolescents in grades 7-12 in the United States during the 1994-95 school year. The participants were interviewed as 18- to 28-year-olds from 2001 to 2002. The study also looked at the General Social Survey, another cross-national data collection source.

Kanazawa did not find that higher or lower intelligence predicted sexual exclusivity in women. This makes sense, because having one partner has always been advantageous to women, even thousands of years ago, meaning exclusivity is not a "new" preference.

For men, on the other hand, sexual exclusivity goes against the grain evolutionarily. With a goal of spreading genes, early men had multiple mates. Since women had to spend nine months being pregnant, and additional years caring for very young children, it made sense for them to want a steady mate to provide them resources.

Religion, the current theory goes, did not help people survive or reproduce necessarily, but goes along the lines of helping people to be paranoid, Kanazawa said. Assuming that, for example, a noise in the distance is a signal of a threat helped early humans to prepare in case of danger.

"It helps life to be paranoid, and because humans are paranoid, they become more religious, and they see the hands of God everywhere," Kanazawa said.

Participants who said they were atheists had an average IQ of 103 in adolescence, while adults who said they were religious averaged 97, the study found. Atheism "allows someone to move forward and speculate on life without any concern for the dogmatic structure of a religion," Bailey said.

"Historically, anything that's new and different can be seen as a threat in terms of the religious beliefs; almost all religious systems are about permanence," he noted.

The study takes the American view of liberal vs. conservative. It defines "liberal" in terms of concern for genetically nonrelated people and support for private resources that help those people. It does not look at other factors that play into American political beliefs, such as abortion, gun control and gay rights.

"Liberals are more likely to be concerned about total strangers; conservatives are likely to be concerned with people they associate with," he said.

Given that human ancestors had a keen interest in the survival of their offspring and nearest kin, the conservative approach -- looking out for the people around you first -- fits with the evolutionary picture more than liberalism, Kanazawa said. "It's unnatural for humans to be concerned about total strangers." he said.

The study found that young adults who said they were "very conservative" had an average adolescent IQ of 95, whereas those who said they were "very liberal" averaged 106.

It also makes sense that "conservatism" as a worldview of keeping things stable would be a safer approach than venturing toward the unfamiliar, Bailey said.

Neither Bailey nor Kanazawa identify themselves as liberal; Bailey is conservative and Kanazawa is "a strong libertarian."

Vegetarianism, while not strongly associated with IQ in this study, has been shown to be related to intelligence in previous research, Kanazawa said. This also fits into Bailey's idea that unconventional preferences appeal to people with higher intelligence, and can also be a means of showing superiority.

None of this means that the human species is evolving toward a future where these traits are the default, Kanazawa said.

"More intelligent people don't have more children, so moving away from the trajectory is not going to happen," he said.

I think we knew it all along...

[Uzor]

http://www.cnn.com/2010/HEALTH/02/26...ex.html?hpt=P1



I think we knew it all along...

At least now there's studies to support it.

[Izzy]

It's like you woke up this morning, and thought to yourself, "Hmmmm, I'd really like to pick a fight today...but I'm not sure how to do it. Ah ha! I've got it!"

[Celeras]

Always appreciate scientific confirmation to things I already knew.

[Komm Suesser Tod]

It's like you woke up this morning, and thought to yourself, "Hmmmm, I'd really like to pick a fight today...but I'm not sure how to do it. Ah ha! I've got it!"

It seems like anyone stating something, asking a question or just starting a topic is enough to start a fight.

Anything on top of that is just insurance.

[Mizango]

Always appreciate scientific confirmation to things I already knew.

Amen lol. Oh man, when Lief sees this....

[Blarg]

Take that you stupid polygamists!!!


Somehow I don't think that will be the point of contention here

[ephel]

I'm doomed. At least i fit one of the criteria.

[Tempyst]

as a liberal, atheist, sexually exclusive male I would like to say even if this article is true, liberal, atheist, sexually exclusive males do a great job of making themselves look like retards on the internet

see: 95% of posts in general discussion

[Kryssan]

Amen lol. Oh man, when Lief sees this....

God's in his Heaven -
All's right with the world!

Browning couldn't possibly be wrong.

[Conrad]

Correlation =/= causation

http://imgs.xkcd.com/comics/correlation.png

[Vajra]

God created man, but that's just my opinion because I grew up that way, no Atheist can change my opinion ni66as. Medical Science is the only science I can agree with really, along with some Earth Science .

[Mizango]

If it doesn't fit =/= you must acquit.

[Mizango]

God created man, but that's just my opinion because I grew up that way, no Atheist can change my opinion ni66as. Medical Science is the only science I can agree with really, along with some Earth Science .

loool. So you're cherry picking your science now? Only because it helps your stupid ass when your God wont help you? How convenient.

You shit on us as a whole, yet when you or your family is stricken with an illness, you tuck tail and come running? Its cool, thats all the lulz we need. You can talk big and shout god from the highest mountain tops all you wish, but we know where you really run when you need something.

[Correction]

Lying about that 'I trust medical science' when it would have told you to not be in hysterics over H1N1.

[Mizango]

Lying about that 'I trust medical science' when it would have told you to not be in hysterics over H1N1.

That's his bread and butter yo. Also, that dig was at Vajra, I personally don't care what you believe, but his hypocrisies are fucking mind numbing.

[Correction]

Yeah I was to lazy to quote Vaj to provide context to my post. It's a steaming pile to say "I trust only specific sciences" when science is a process, not a series of novels telling different stories or some shit. Leave it to Christians to do that though, since even they only trust the second half of the bible for most shit.

[Mizango]

*brofist

[Kryssan]

Medical Science is the only science I can agree with really, along with some Earth Science .

That's cool, guess that means I'm a witch. Bring on the torches.

[Asura_Zilla]

Prime example of lower IQ and selective behavior.