If you've ever wondered why the year 2011 doesn't remotely resemble the optimistic futures envisioned by sci-fi, here's one big reason why.
http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories...MPLATE=DEFAULT
http://hosted.ap.org/photos/3/3fc16e...471e61-big.jpg
As sure as cocaine and raw milk are prohibited from being sold, so too are moon rocks or any material resources obtained while in outer space.
Federal officials arranged a sting operation whereby they posed as NASA were interested in buying a tiny fragment of moon rock from an elderly 74 year old woman. They then met up at a Denny's restaurant and stormed the place with armed men, taking the woman and her fragment paper-weight.
Why the prohibition that relegates moon rocks to a black market? As the NASA investigator from the news article says: "Gutheinz said. "I've always taken the position that no one should own an Apollo-era moon rock. They belong to the people."
In other words the idea that a person can "own" a part of something from outer space is terrible and unthinkable. It's the same motivation behind the international law forbidding all private ownership or selling of resources obtained in space.
The whole thing is jaw dropping and ridiculous. So for now space will remain the pristine and untouched void of useless nothing. Ideally what should be done is to get rid of ownership prohibition and formulate some new and pioneering standards for how to establish property rights in space.
XI Wiki


