Two examples that inspired me to ask this somewhat rhetorical question:
The Ikea catalog distributed in Saudi Arabia is the same as in other countries except for what it's missing — women.
The Swedish publication Metro has posted a comparison of the Saudi Arabian mailer and the Swedish version, showing that women present in the latter were missing from the former.
n one instance, a pajama-clad woman — shown standing at a bathroom sink along with a man, young boy and toddler nearby — was erased from the catalog distributed in the Arab nation, leaving just the three other people in the picture.
http://www.latimes.com/business/la-f...,1093474.story
http://articles.nydailynews.com/2011...on-image-photoA Hasidic newspaper said it was following Jewish modesty laws when it printed a Situation Room photo that was doctored to remove Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and a second female White House staffer.
The Brooklyn-based Der Zeitung sparked Internet outcry after it published the now iconic photo Friday showing only men present to monitor the daring 40-minute Navy SEALs raid that killed Osama Bin Laden.
National Security team member Audrey Tomason was also scrubbed from the image.
The ultra-Orthodox Der Zeitung released a statement Monday apologizing if the edited image "was seen as offensive," but said it was following Jewish modesty laws when it made the decision to delete Clinton and Tomason from historical record.
Maybe someone might drop some historical facts on why religions of the book (Torah, Bible, Koran) seem to have such an overriding obsession with controlling women, to such extants as to even want to erase them from public viewing.
XI Wiki


