ofn but i still lol'd
http://www.fmft.net/archives/BBC_NEWS.htm
ofn but i still lol'd
http://www.fmft.net/archives/BBC_NEWS.htm
Is this real?
=| Are you serious?Originally Posted by Lbelle
http://lionvs40midgets.uk-directory.com/ + look at the url![]()
Originally Posted by Lbelle
![]()
Midgets are funny ^_________________^
rfofn and fake to boot.
It's not real, and it came out in 2005 (I remember a friend of mine printed it out and showed it to us at the lunch table and believed it).
Definatly fake.
And theres no way a lion can take down 48 midgets anyway.
Originally Posted by Not Kuno
lol'd
I heard byakko got pissed at 42 tarus..same incident?
Were they chinese?Originally Posted by Vobent
I loled!Originally Posted by BRP
The midgets were supposed to be unarmed.Originally Posted by Not Kuno
I beg to differ. >.>
Its 48 though. Seriously. You can get them to like hold down each leg and go for the eyes etc all at once.Originally Posted by Jyakku
[quote=Not Kuno]Its 48 though. Seriously. You can get them to like hold down each leg and go for the eyes etc all at once.[/quote:0e523]Originally Posted by Jyakku
its 42!!!
and yeah 40 people of any size with a little intelligence could easily break legs and it's over from there
[quote=Not Kuno]Its 48 though. Seriously. You can get them to like hold down each leg and go for the eyes etc all at once.[/quote:db47e]Originally Posted by Jyakku
That's like saying you couldn't beat up 48 5 year olds.
first of all, you wouldn't get 48 on the lion at once, maybe 15-20 at a given time could actually be within a midgets 1 foot arm length, and midgets don't exactly have a ton of muscle mass. A lion could destroy them without breaking a sweat if they were unarmed.
are we really discussing whether or not its possible 42/48 midgets could take down a lion or not lol
Yes
and the Lion would destroy them
all the midgets have to do is charge in and drop-kick the lion in the knees repeatedly
I would love to see an animated video to see what would win. Kinda like what the discovery channel does with the animal vs. animal.