So today I got in an argument with one of my friends (again) about the kind of salary a construction workers makes compared to someone who has a college degree. His argument (which is very poor in my opinion) is that while the college student is going to be in school, the construction worker getting paid 40,000 dollars a year (that's being optimistic) will be at least 4 years ahead of the college student once he gets out of college. Meaning the construction worker will have earned 160,000 by the time the student gets out in the field. Now, my counterpart of the argument is that even though the construction worker has made more money in the beginning, the college student will earn a lot more money in the long run. Not to mention with work that is considerably easier on one's body. To me, that is common sense, but the guy just keeps arguing that someone that doesnt have an education has the same chances to be "successful" as someone who does. Although it has happened in the past in some cases, it is very rare. In my opinion my friend just wants to justify his lack of effort in his studies, but reality is going to give him a hard blow when he realizes how much of dead end job it is. Finally, he also argues that you can get promoted faster while being a construction worker than the college student. I did my research on what a construction worker can end up as, compared to a civil engineer. Now the construction worker can end up being supervisor at 50,000 dollars a year, while the newly graduated engineer starts off at a minimum of 47,000.
What does BG think? Am I right, am I wrong? Does this apply to other parts of industry?
XI Wiki

