Eat 30% less = Smarter, live longer, look younger

[wop]

Fewer calories equals a longer life -- At least in monkeys - CNN.com

Cutting daily calorie intake by 30 percent may put the brakes on the aging process, have beneficial effects on the brain, and result in a longer life span, according to a new 20-year study of monkeys published in the journal Science.

The study confirms in primates what's long been known in other species, including mice, worms, and flies. And it's no surprise to the humans who have taken the animal research to heart and adopted calorie restriction as a means to a (hopefully) longer and healthier life.

Brian M. Delaney has been eating 20 percent fewer calories than most people of his size and stature since 1992. "The new study confirms everything we have seen," says Delaney, coauthor of "The Longevity Diet" and president of the nonprofit Calorie Restriction Society, which had 2,000 members in 2007 and thousands more on mailing lists. "It also adds some new information on brain volume changes."

In the study of 76 adult rhesus monkeys (a species that shares many similarities with humans), only 13 percent of the calorie-restricted animals died during the 20-year period, compared with 37 percent of monkeys allowed to eat their usual diet. (The study began with 30 monkeys; an additional 46 were added in 1994.) Health.com: I survived the Master Cleanse -- Then gained all the weight back

At the start of the study, the researchers analyzed how much the monkeys were eating and then cut the calories by 10 percent each month for three months in the calorie-restricted group. The other monkeys were allowed to eat as much as they wanted.

The calorie-restricted monkeys preserved volume in areas of their brain that have been linked to motor control, memory, and problem-solving.

"The new study shows the effects of calorie restriction in primates that are closely related to humans," says lead researcher Ricki Colman, Ph.D., an associate scientist at the Wisconsin National Primate Research Center, in Madison. "Monkeys in the calorie-restricted group are more likely to live healthier, longer." The oldest monkey in the study is now 29. This species has an average lifespan of 27 when in captivity.

"We don't know about ultimate longevity yet, but the monkeys in the calorie-restricted group are unencumbered by age-related diseases and brain atrophy, which is linked to cognitive ability," says Colman. Health.com: I had a heart attack at 43

Monkeys in both groups consumed very healthful diets. "We are studying calorie restriction, not malnutrition," stresses Colman, who does not follow this type of diet herself. The study diet included 15 percent protein and 10 percent fat and was enriched with vitamins.

As an advocate of calorie-restricted diets, Delaney says he isn't starving, despite his low-calorie lifestyle.

He eats a hearty breakfast including a large bowl of low-fat granola and fruit, soy milk, nonfat yogurt, and a cup of coffee. Delaney admits his 900-or-so-calorie breakfast is more than most people consume in the morning, but he then skips lunch, works an eight- or nine-hour day, and eats a high-fiber, vegetarian dinner, keeping his total intake under 2,000 calories a day. (An average adult male consumes 2,618 calories a day, according to statistics from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.)

As a result, Delaney may live a longer and healthier life than his peers who consume more calories. Studies in mice, worms, and flies have shown that this type of diet -- which is not a form of malnutrition or an exercise in self-starvation -- results in longer lives and a lower risk of some cancers, heart disease, and other illnesses associated with aging. Health.com: Why belly fat is bad for your lungs, and why exercise is good

Exactly how a calorie-restricted diet helps stave off age-related diseases and extend lifespan is unknown, but controlling calories can help people lose weight or maintain a healthy weight. Obesity is a major risk factor for many diseases. Eating healthy, nutrient-dense foods can also produce important physiologic changes in the body, which may lower disease risk.

However, not everyone agrees that such severe calorie restriction is a good idea. Keri Gans, R.D., a nutritionist in private practice in New York City and a spokesperson for the American Dietetic Association, has some concerns about both the short- and long-term effects of calorie restriction.

"If you go too far, it can lead to a lot of problems such as dizziness and fatigue in the short term," she says. "In the long term, there can be nutritional deficiencies, decreases in bone mineral density that can lead to osteoporosis, and menstrual irregularities that can lead to infertility.

"Once you start to restrict calories, there is no guarantee of adequate nutrition unless you are following a plan monitored by a registered dietitian," she says. "The less calories you consume, the harder it may be to ensure that your diet includes foods that provide proper nutrition." Health.com: 5 secrets to get-slim success

Even though Delaney is a believer, he agrees that calorie restriction is not for everyone. "If you are pregnant or really old, it is not clear that you can get much benefit, and it may be risky," he says.

He is also quick to point out that a calorie-restricted diet for humans means different things to different people.

"It isn't any one number; it's a principle," he says. "Cutting daily calories by 5 percent is a mild version of calorie restriction, and according to research in lab animals and some in humans, you will get some of the benefits," he says. Others may restrict calories by 20 percent, he says. Health.com: 8 tips for controlling portion sizes

"There really isn't any magic number," Delaney says. His advice? Forget about total calories, measure what you are eating, and go to your doctor to check your fasting glucose, cholesterol, and blood pressure. "Reduce your calories by a little bit for a few months, then go back to the doctor and see if your numbers have improved," he suggests.

If your numbers have improved, it may mean you are aging at a reduced rate, he says. High cholesterol, blood pressure, and diabetes are all linked to heart disease and premature death.

Malena Perdomo, R.D., an American Dietetic Association spokesperson and a clinical outpatient dietitian at Kaiser Permanente Colorado, in Denver, says the new study is interesting. "We have seen similar results in mice and we know that by controlling body weight, we have better health outcomes," she says.

Controlling portion sizes and reducing calories is the key to weight loss, but restricting calories should be done carefully, she advises. "The first step is to get rid of high fat, high sugar foods in the diet, and then we move on to the quality of diet and make sure there are adequate fruits, vegetables, whole grains, lean protein, and low-fat dairy in the diet."

Delaney agrees -- these healthful foods are the building blocks of a calorie-restricted diet.

[Shenrien]

my doc says I'm healthy and I eat whatever the hell I want, placebo is just that, and I don't really work out much and I average right now 120lbs. and I'm just about 21yrs old so... I'm callin bull shit on this, its how you take care of yourself overall which can help you live longer, by eating the right shit, not shoving down McDonalds everyday and claiming that you ate a meal just by doing so when really you probably shaved 9 days off of your life.

[Jotaru]

'not shoving McDonalds down your throat' and 'eating 30% less' can BOTH make you live longer, you know. They aren't mutually exclusive.

[Yuri-G]

sure, but will it stop my HIV from ravaging my body? I think not!

...aw I made myself sad

[Dezzimal]

Dupe 30% less salvage drops, gain longer account lifetime.

[Eaglestrike]

my doc says I'm healthy and I eat whatever the hell I want, placebo is just that, and I don't really work out much and I average right now 120lbs. and I'm just about 21yrs old so... I'm callin bull shit on this, its how you take care of yourself overall which can help you live longer, by eating the right shit, not shoving down McDonalds everyday and claiming that you ate a meal just by doing so when really you probably shaved 9 days off of your life.

You're not normal. At all.

[Tomiko]

Shouldn't it be 60% less? (well 66% if you want to be technical)

[Kayu]

yeah since monkeys are the same a humans!!
yeah yeah we are 3-5% different but what people dont think is that 3-5% how many billions of cells and genes is XD now that 3-5% doesnt look that small isnt it?

[Metah]

I thought it was well documented that eating less has numerous health benefits

[Blarg]

Sweet, to prepare for this I will eat 60% more for the next year and then cut it by 30%. Now I can live longer and never be hungry again.

[Plow]

title really should be "eat 30% less calories" ...

[Gregorio]

sure, but will it stop my HIV from ravaging my body? I think not!

...aw I made myself sad

Well think of it this way...You can only get AIDS once!

[HadesChubbs]

I'm relatively sure 30% of the people posting in this thread are the fucking monkeys themselves. Idiots.

This is a well-thought idea, now being reinforced by science. Just say cool, instead of posting how you're the exception, or why you think its bullshit.

[Blarg]

yeah since monkeys are the same a humans!!
yeah yeah we are 3-5% different but what people dont think is that 3-5% how many billions of cells and genes is XD now that 3-5% doesnt look that small isnt it?

Well there are 95-97 times that many cells that are the same, makes it seem like not much at all does it.

[Tricen]

Eating less is an extremely good way to lose weight. You'd be surprised how many people don't realize this, and how many people eat out of leisure or boredom. I used to work at a grocery store and I'd see fat people buying fat people-esque stuff until they plop a case of diet soda or fat-free yogurt (gallon sized nonetheless) on the conveyor belt. Eating healthy food is good for you. Eating a lot of healthy food is not going to solve your weight problems. You eat to retain energy, if you are sedentary (like me) you don't need to eat that much. I lost like 25lbs in a months or so from just not eating as much, and people complain about being fat. Not exactly on the topic of the article, but it just goes to show you how stupid people can be.

[Blarg]

You also have to eat less intelligently. Skipping breakfast isn't a sound weight loss plan.

[Kayu]

Well there are 95-97 times that many cells that are the same, makes it seem like not much at all does it.

that doesnt mean the same, wich thats why this scientific test breakthrougth has more chance of errors since every body of every human is different, and is the same for monkeys, that works on them doesnt mean it work on us, is not the same, this research has room for more documentation, but is kinda hard to test it fully on humans since they have long lives(at least the average human and monkey is about 15-25 years).
also eating healthy is good but your body need carbs and exercice, but eating MCdonnals or buttload of chips every day, sure isnt going to help you live XD longer, everything over consume is bad for us, just consume in a normal way, drink your shoot of vodka, glass of wine everyday you will be fine.

[Blarg]

that doesnt mean the same, wich thats why this scientific test breakthrougth has more chance of errors since every body of every human is different, and is the same for monkeys, that works on them doesnt mean it work on us, is not the same, this research has room for more documentation, but is kinda hard to test it fully on humans since they have long lives(at least the average human and monkey is about 15-25 years).
also eating healthy is good but your body need carbs and exercice, but eating MCdonnals or buttload of chips every day, sure isnt going to help you live XD longer, everything over consume is bad for us, just consume in a normal way, drink your shoot of vodka, glass of wine everyday you will be fine.

I wasn't trying to say that 95% the same means it will work perfectly for us but to show that you can't just say that 5% difference is a billion trillion cells hoping to artificially amplify the difference when in fact there are still that many times more cells that are the same. Seemed a disingenuous way to say that monkeys aren't people. It's kinda like you throw 2 darts and they end up in the same spot but then you say but they are millions of atoms apart!, doesn't seem so close now.

More of a nitpick than a content problem.

[Darus Grey]

This isn't about weight loss or healthy weight, it's about abusing a process known as ketosis.

The process of aging itself is essentially like your cells have a certain amount of times they can reproduce before they simply stop doing it, or go cancerous. When your body thinks it's starving, it slows down many bodily functions(ketosis), which actually slows down your aging.

If you did it from 10yrs old, and lived to 100, your body cells would actually be similar to those of a 70yr olds.

There's essentially a buffer zone in terms of calorie intake where you can stay permanently in ketosis but still be taking in enough calories to sustain basic body function and be healthy. You will however need to live a more sedentary lifestyle, which if you do anyways, is win/win. Otherwise you'll become anorexic.

[Nystul]

yeah since monkeys are the same a humans!!
yeah yeah we are 3-5% different but what people dont think is that 3-5% how many billions of cells and genes is XD now that 3-5% doesnt look that small isnt it?

Hi. Don't talk about biology because you don't know anything about it. Human genome is around 20-25,000 genes. Number of cells is irrelevant when comparing the genetic difference between humans and other primates.


To Shenren:
You can eat whatever you want because you're fucking 21. WHen I was 18-21 or so I could eat 2 big macs and a super size fries and I wouldn't gain a pound. You also may be fairly active. When you get older things change a LOT.