Page 1 of 6 1 2 3 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 114
  1. #1
    Queen of the Pity Party
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    11,718
    BG Level
    9

    finally someone got it right

    http://bostonherald.com/news/regiona...oc#articleFull

    http://multimedia.heraldinteractive....i_01032010.jpg

    A 35-year-old mother of nine is suing a Springfield hospital, three doctors and two nurses, claiming they permanently sterilized her against her will, violating her reproductive rights, according to a lawsuit filed in Superior Court.
    Tessa Savicki, who has nine children aged 3 to 21, claims doctors were supposed to implant an intrauterine device, which is a type of reversible birth control, after she delivered a son, Manuel Flores, on Dec. 19, 2006, at Baystate Medical Center.
    Instead, she said, a type of permanent sterilization known as a tubal ligation was performed, leaving her mentally distraught and incapable of bearing more children.

    “There was no medical reason for them to do this,” Savicki told the Herald. “That’s my choice. This is my body. I wanted the IUD so later if I felt I wanted more children, I could have more.”
    Savicki said she did not sign a written consent for a tubal ligation, which under federal and state regulations is required at least 30 days in advance for all MassHealth patients who want a permanent sterilization procedure.
    Savicki’s attorney, Max Borten of Waltham, alleges that his client’s human and constitutional rights were violated and that the hospital had a “total breakdown of protocols.”
    “There were violations at many, many levels,” said Borten, a former obstetrician and gynecologist who practiced as a physician for more than 30 years in Massachusetts.
    Medical records sought
    Borten provided the Herald with a Baystate Medical Center letter on Savicki’s case, signed on May 22, 2009, by an employee of the hospital’s Health Information Management System department. It reads: “We regret to tell you that in spite of carefully and thoroughly searching, we have been unable to locate the following medical records: ‘Tubal consent form for December 2006.’ ”
    The signed letter was sent by Baystate to one of Savicki’s previous attorneys, Borten said.
    Baystate spokeswoman Jane Albert confirmed that the document was signed and sent by an employee in the Health Information Management System department. She declined to comment on it.
    She also declined to comment on Savicki’s allegations or the lawsuit. The hospital was served with the lawsuit Dec. 15, she said.
    “There’s pending litigation. We can’t comment and that holds true for the doctors,” Albert said.
    Savicki is suing Drs. Michael P. Plevyak and James Kuo Chang Wang and a third physician who has not yet been served, as well as two nurses and the medical center, according to the complaint, filed on Nov. 24 in Hampden Superior Court. The complaint alleges Savicki suffered “substantial pain and emotional distress and incurred severe and permanent physical injuries.”
    Plevyak and Wang did not respond to calls and e-mails seeking comment. On Dec. 16, Albert issued this statement to the Herald on their behalfs: “I cannot comment on this as it is in litigation.”
    Savicki said she brought the IUD into the operating room, unopened and in a box, on Dec. 19, 2006. She said she handed the box to the nurse prior to the planned Caesarean section. Her medical record notes that the IUD was to be implanted following delivery, according to the complaint.

    Post-delivery notes indicate she received a tubal ligation, the complaint says. The surgical notes were reviewed by the Herald.
    This is the second time Savicki has sued over reproductive issues. In 2001, she reached a settlement with CVS and a spermacide company after she became pregnant with her now 12-year-old daughter after claiming she bought and used an expired spermacide, according to federal court documents.
    Savicki has nine children from several men, is unemployed and relies on public assistance for two of the four children who live with her. She receives supplemental security income, or SSI, for a disability, non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, she said. Her mother has custody of three of her children. Two of her children are no longer minors.

    ‘It’s my choice’
    Savicki acknowledged that some may feel little sympathy for her situation, but cautioned against public judgment because she is a poor, unmarried mother of 9.
    “I would never have the right to tell anyone else ‘because you have this many kids that’s enough,’ ” she said. “That’s no one’s right to say that. It’s my choice. No one has the right to say you’ve had enough.
    “I take care of my kids. I love my kids. I was not ready to make that kind of decision,” she said of the permanent sterilization.
    Savicki said her life has stabilized in the last decade after a rocky start. She had her first child at 13 and dropped out of high school in the ninth grade.
    Savicki said she’s been in a relationship with her fiance, Angel Flores Tirado, 36, since she was 25. She lives with him and the couple’s three children. Tirado helps support the family with his full-time job as a personal care assistant. Savicki said she’s had eight of her nine children while in committed relationships and hoped for one more child with Tirado.
    “It’s not like I’m jumping from guy to guy to guy to get pregnant,” she said. “I’m trying to make a healthy home for my children.”]

    -

    my favorite part is "I take care of my kids." yeah, apparently not without the state's help you don't.

    if the doctors really did this without her consent, that's pretty fucked up and shady, but... I'm not gonna say I don't understand their motivation.

  2. #2
    okay guy I guess
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    24,249
    BG Level
    10

    SHoulda just busted a cap in her ass and put the kids up for adoption

  3. #3
    Banned.

    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    1,661
    BG Level
    6

    doin it right

  4. #4
    Nidhogg
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    3,562
    BG Level
    7

    it's a vagina not a clown car.gif

  5. #5
    Cyn
    Cyn is offline
    Old Odin
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    6,094
    BG Level
    8
    FFXIV Character
    Cyn Dane
    FFXIV Server
    Hyperion
    FFXI Server
    Valefor

    Even if the hospital loses, the world wins.

  6. #6
    A. Body
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    4,167
    BG Level
    7
    FFXIV Character
    Minerva Kissaki
    FFXIV Server
    Gilgamesh
    FFXI Server
    Leviathan

    little kid on the far right looks like "Savee meee"

  7. #7
    TOO MUCH MAN
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    8,264
    BG Level
    8

    Savicki said she’s had eight of her nine children while in committed relationships and hoped for one more child with Tirado.
    lol.

    She clearly displayed that she shouldn't have children after she had one at 13.

  8. #8
    Ridill
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    11,001
    BG Level
    9
    FFXI Server
    Shiva
    WoW Realm
    Azuremyst

    good job doctors. not easy being a hero.


  9. #9
    blax n gunz
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    11,141
    BG Level
    9

    Not doing it right, they did it 9 kids too late.

  10. #10
    Witty Custom Title
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    2,849
    BG Level
    7
    FFXIV Character
    Eticket Pogona
    FFXIV Server
    Hyperion
    FFXI Server
    Valefor

    9 kids... how many daddies? I'm betting at least 6.

  11. #11
    The Flying Scotsman
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    1,652
    BG Level
    6

    Quote Originally Posted by Guitarman View Post
    good job doctors. not easy being a hero.

    Fucking-A right, this 1000x.

  12. #12
    E. Body
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    2,229
    BG Level
    7

    Quote Originally Posted by Yuri-G View Post
    This is the second time Savicki has sued over reproductive issues. In 2001, she reached a settlement with CVS and a spermacide company after she became pregnant with her now 12-year-old daughter after claiming she bought and used an expired spermacide, according to federal court documents.

    Savicki has nine children from several men, is unemployed and relies on public assistance for two of the four children who live with her. She receives supplemental security income, or SSI, for a disability, non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, she said. Her mother has custody of three of her children. Two of her children are no longer minors.

    ‘It’s my choice’
    Savicki acknowledged that some may feel little sympathy for her situation, but cautioned against public judgment because she is a poor, unmarried mother of 9.
    “I would never have the right to tell anyone else ‘because you have this many kids that’s enough,’ ” she said. “That’s no one’s right to say that. It’s my choice. No one has the right to say you’ve had enough.
    “I take care of my kids. I love my kids. I was not ready to make that kind of decision,” she said of the permanent sterilization.
    Good god. No, no it isn't your fucking choice any more. Stupid cunt, should be stipulations if you are on public assistance you can't have children, period. So much wrong with this bitch, she is a life sucking parasite of the world. As far as I am concerned, she is a god damn criminal with no more rights.

  13. #13
    Ridill
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    22,165
    BG Level
    10

    Yeah! Women have every right to choice with what they want to do with their bodies as far as reproduction goes, as long as they don't want to have more babies!

  14. #14
    Cerberus
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    469
    BG Level
    4
    FFXI Server
    Quetzalcoatl

    banning abortions is bad! we shouldn't dictate what women do with their own bodies!

    ...

    this bitch had nine kids and is on welfare! seal her uterus with concrete!


    ahh damn you plow

  15. #15
    Nidhogg
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    3,732
    BG Level
    7

    Quote Originally Posted by Zoolander View Post
    Good god. No, no it isn't your fucking choice any more. Stupid cunt, should be stipulations if you are on public assistance you can't have children, period. So much wrong with this bitch, she is a life sucking parasite of the world. As far as I am concerned, she is a god damn criminal with no more rights.
    I just don't get it. All the government needs to do, is add penalties to those who receive assistance and continue to reproduce without a means to support themselves. I mean this is a common problem among many welfare families. I don't care if it's their choice, bitch you CANT SUPPORT ANYMORE CHILDREN. Get Sterilized or you lose the Welfare money. It's my fucking money paying for your god damn children.

  16. #16
    Bagel
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    1,325
    BG Level
    6

    I'm all for banning women from having children if their only way to pay for the kid is the state. I mean, at this point we are basically paying for her to be a whore.

  17. #17
    Banned.

    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    10,115
    BG Level
    9

    A hospital in Springfield, this has comedic potential; and kudos to the good doctors.

  18. #18
    I'm not safe on my island
    Nikkei will still get me.

    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    20,043
    BG Level
    10

    Sometimes i wonder whether the demographic of this forum really is atheist/liberal.

  19. #19
    Cyn
    Cyn is offline
    Old Odin
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    6,094
    BG Level
    8
    FFXIV Character
    Cyn Dane
    FFXIV Server
    Hyperion
    FFXI Server
    Valefor

    The demographic of this forum is clearly troll.

  20. #20
    blax n gunz
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    11,141
    BG Level
    9

    Quote Originally Posted by Cyn View Post
    The demographic of this forum is clearly troll.
    /bg/ has nothing on the comments section in the article itself.

Page 1 of 6 1 2 3 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. I just don't understand why SE can't get it right.
    By Amarok in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 25
    Last Post: 2005-04-20, 23:06