Iota vs Sniper +1 vs monies

[Kipling]

Fucking Iota Rings, I swear.

[Maxxthepenguin]

Fucking Iota Rings, I swear.

Better than rings that aren't sniper+1/toreador for 2h!

I'm considering getting it, tbh

[pchan]

Fucking Iota Rings, I swear.

yeah apparently you need sniper+1 in dynamis.

[Kipling]

Better than rings that aren't sniper+1/toreador for 2h!

I'm considering getting it, tbh

While that is true, with a relic you'd think you'd buy items such as sniper's +1 etc before you start working on it. (I know I would.)

yeah apparently you need sniper+1 in dynamis.

Every time you post it just makes it clearer why people laugh at you for being retarded. Gimping yourself even for one event (Who buys gear based on dynamis? Do you? I wouldn't doubt it.) is still gimping yourself. Are you one of those melee's who don't eat food in dynamis or don't use food in salvage or at bird camps either?

But then again, your uneven amount of dex using the ring makes it ok, right?

Kill yourself.

[bruice]

Arson - Seraph - Dynacore

http://i10.photobucket.com/albums/a1...310_201104.png

Im more or less crying over those 2 monks Unless the one is a pup not 75 yet but still.

[pchan]

Gimping yourself even for one event (Who buys gear based on dynamis? Do you? I wouldn't doubt it.) is still gimping yourself. Are you one of those melee's who don't eat food in dynamis or don't use food in salvage or at bird camps either?
But then again, your uneven amount of dex using the ring makes it ok, right?
Kill yourself.

accuracy is capped on pup in dynamis stop making smart ass remark about people gear. Sniper+1 is gimp, period.

[Kipling]

accuracy is capped on pup in dynamis stop making smart ass remark about people gear. Sniper+1 is gimp, period.

LOL, knowing you're serious makes it that much funnier.

[Takedown3]

nice out of context sig

[Maxxthepenguin]

While that is true, with a relic you'd think you'd buy items such as sniper's +1 etc before you start working on it. (I know I would.)

3.3 mil for +2 acc.

Definitively not essential.

[Kipling]

3.3 mil for +2 acc.

Definitively not essential.

Neither is spending 100m+ on a weapon...

[Cream Soda]

3.3 mil for +2 acc.

Definitively not essential.

http://images3.wikia.nocookie.net/ff...eadorsRing.png
2.9m, bitches

[Antithesis]

http://images3.wikia.nocookie.net/ff...eadorsRing.png
2.9m, bitches

Blood ring is free. Ill buy some hookers and blackjack with 2.9m

[Maxxthepenguin]

Neither is spending 100m+ on a weapon...

And there is a hierarchy of inessential items?

[Kipling]

And there is a hierarchy of inessential items?

Just seems like if you're going to spend THAT much money on a weapon, a 2-3m ring should be a walk in the park and picked up first?

[Cream Soda]

I was more concerned with the smart grenade tbh

[pugnax179]

I was more concerned with the smart grenade tbh

i told uryuu that on vent im like all things aside from the the iota, smart grenade?

[Charismatic]

Maybe I'm misunderstanding something here but even Ulthalam's ring is better than Iota ring, right?

[Maxxthepenguin]

Maybe I'm misunderstanding something here but even Ulthalam's ring is better than Iota ring, right?

Kind of? If you break crit tier, Iota better outside assault/salvage. Otherwise Ulth is better.
Not a big deal either way.

[Marcicus]

I don't really see how an Amano is a game-breaking weapon, unless you were speaking in general terms.

[Araelus]

Argh, this point always comes up... >_>

The gear-criticizers are saying that a player who is acting in an economically rational manner will purchase items in order from most efficient to least efficient. The anti-gear-criticizers claim that making one large increase in strength (non relic → relic) is more important or useful than any number of small increases (NQ → HQ in other slots) since the relic guy can afford to do either, or both, so they might as well go for the large upgrade first.

The gear-criticizers are correct. But congrats on the relic anyway.