serious question

[Callisto]

been kinda wondering for awhile

I use just plain Windows Media Player for all of my music, and for burning CDs. I always see a ton of people hating on it and saying to to use it and to go find a cracked copy of blahblah program instead it's much better. I'm not computertician so I'm just wondering what's so bad about WMP and what's so much better about other programs that do the same stuff?

[Krye]

If you have to ask then you don't deserve to know

[Callisto]

that's the same thing yahoo answers said actually

[Alleya]

Part of it is just anti-microsfot anti-mainstream typical internet bullshit. The other part is that other programs do the same tasks much better. For exmaple I use Foobar 2000, which has a barebones interface, tabbed playlists, extremely comprehensive file format compatibility, replaygain compatability, tag reading/editing/metatagging/masstagging, format conversions, an easily modded interface, an intuitive and powerful library system, and customizable sorting options, while using virtually no cpu/ram.

LONG STORY SHORT SHIT IS SITUATIOINAL PERSONAL PREFERENCE BRO USE WHAT WORKS FOR YOU BUT IF YOU DON'T USE FOOBAR YOU ARE A NOOB

[#686578]

Eh I just use VLC

I use Foobar for everything else that's not playback

[Blarg]

burning cd's is so 2006